Abraham Lincoln's 1860 Election: A Nation Divided, the Path to Civil War and America's Transformation

Abraham Lincoln's 1860 Election: A Nation Divided, the Path to Civil War and America's Transformation

Abraham Lincoln’s election in 1860 marked a pivotal turning point in American history, one that would soon lead to the outbreak of the Civil War and profoundly reshape the United States. The election of 1860 was set against a backdrop of intense national debate over slavery, states' rights, and the future of the Union. As the country grappled with these issues, the election emerged as a four-way contest between Lincoln, John C. Breckinridge, John Bell, and Stephen A. Douglas. Each candidate represented different political factions and regions, and their campaigns highlighted the deep sectional divides that plagued the nation.

 

The Prelude to the 1860 Election: A Nation in Crisis

By the 1850s, the United States was in the throes of a fierce debate over the institution of slavery and its expansion into newly acquired territories. The Mexican-American War (1846-1848) had resulted in the U.S. gaining new lands in the West, intensifying debates over whether slavery should be permitted in these areas. While the Northern states largely opposed the spread of slavery, fearing its moral and economic consequences, Southern states were determined to expand slavery, seeing it as vital to their agricultural economy and way of life.

The Compromise of 1850 and the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 attempted to address these issues, but each, in turn, only inflamed tensions. The Kansas-Nebraska Act, in particular, introduced the concept of "popular sovereignty," allowing the residents of a territory to decide whether to permit slavery. This led to bloody conflicts in Kansas, known as "Bleeding Kansas," as pro-slavery and anti-slavery forces clashed, a grim foreshadowing of the conflict to come.

The 1857 Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford further polarized the nation by ruling that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, could not be considered citizens and that Congress had no authority to prohibit slavery in federal territories. The ruling enraged abolitionists and strengthened the resolve of anti-slavery advocates in the North. It also helped fuel the formation of the Republican Party, a new political movement dedicated to halting the expansion of slavery.

The Rise of Abraham Lincoln

Abraham Lincoln, a former Illinois congressman, had gained national attention in the late 1850s through his debates with Stephen A. Douglas, the Democratic Senator from Illinois, during the Illinois Senate race. Although Lincoln lost that race, his eloquence and moral stance against the spread of slavery made him a prominent figure within the emerging Republican Party. His views on slavery were complex: while he opposed its expansion, he was not initially an abolitionist advocating for immediate emancipation in the South. Rather, he believed in containing slavery within its existing boundaries, hoping it would eventually die out.

Lincoln's "House Divided" speech, delivered in 1858, captured the essence of his views and foreshadowed the impending crisis: "A house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this government cannot endure permanently half slave and half free." By 1860, Lincoln had become a unifying figure for Republicans, who viewed him as a moderate, yet principled leader.

The Divisions Among the Democrats

The Democratic Party, one of the oldest political parties in the U.S., was deeply divided over the issue of slavery. At their national convention in Charleston, South Carolina, in April 1860, Southern Democrats demanded a platform that endorsed the right of slaveholders to take their slaves into the territories, a position opposed by many Northern Democrats. When the convention failed to adopt a pro-slavery platform, delegates from the Deep South walked out.

The remaining Democrats reconvened in Baltimore in June, where they eventually nominated Stephen A. Douglas as their candidate. Douglas championed "popular sovereignty" as a solution to the slavery question, hoping it would provide a compromise that could keep the party—and the Union—intact. However, his stance was seen as too moderate by pro-slavery factions, who refused to back him.

In response, the Southern Democrats held their own convention and nominated Vice President John C. Breckinridge of Kentucky. Breckinridge's campaign platform endorsed the idea that slaveholders had the right to bring slaves into any U.S. territory, effectively supporting the expansion of slavery across the nation. Thus, the Democratic Party was now split between Douglas in the North and Breckinridge in the South, a division that would prove fatal to their chances of winning the election.

The Constitutional Union Party and John Bell

Amid the turmoil, a third party emerged—the Constitutional Union Party. Composed mainly of former Whigs and some moderate Democrats, this party sought to preserve the Union by ignoring the slavery issue altogether. Instead, they focused on upholding the Constitution and the rule of law. They nominated John Bell, a former senator from Tennessee, as their candidate. The Constitutional Union Party hoped to draw support from moderates in both the North and South who were disillusioned by the extremism of both the Republicans and the Democrats. However, their ambiguous stance on slavery limited their appeal in a nation increasingly divided on this very issue.

The Republican Party and Abraham Lincoln's Nomination

The Republican National Convention took place in Chicago in May 1860. Although several prominent Republicans vied for the nomination, including William H. Seward of New York, Lincoln emerged as a consensus choice. Lincoln was viewed as a moderate compared to Seward, whose staunch abolitionist views might alienate voters in key swing states. Lincoln's humble background, his reputation for honesty, and his eloquence on the slavery issue made him an attractive candidate to a party seeking to appeal to a broad coalition of Northern voters.

The Republican platform opposed the expansion of slavery but pledged not to interfere with it where it already existed. The platform also supported internal improvements, protective tariffs, and policies that would benefit Northern industry, making it appealing to a broad spectrum of Northern voters, from abolitionists to economic moderates.

The Campaign and Election of 1860

With four candidates in the race, the 1860 election became a contest of regional support. Lincoln's campaign focused on the Northern states, where anti-slavery sentiment was strongest. He did not appear on the ballot in most Southern states, as the Republican Party was viewed as a direct threat to the Southern way of life. In contrast, Breckinridge was primarily a candidate of the South, advocating for the rights of slaveholders. Douglas, the Northern Democrat, tried to appeal to moderates by promoting popular sovereignty, while Bell, representing the Constitutional Union Party, sought to attract voters who prioritized the Union's preservation above all else.

The campaign was marked by intense rhetoric and fear-mongering. In the South, Breckinridge's supporters warned that a Lincoln victory would mean the end of slavery and Southern prosperity. In the North, Republicans warned that the spread of slavery would jeopardize free labor and Northern values.

On November 6, 1860, Lincoln won the election with approximately 40% of the popular vote, capturing the electoral votes of nearly all Northern states. He won 180 out of 303 electoral votes, a decisive victory given the fractured opposition. Douglas, despite his efforts to appeal across regions, only won Missouri and received a fraction of the Southern vote. Breckinridge dominated the Deep South, while Bell managed to win three border states. Lincoln's victory was achieved without winning a single Southern state, underscoring the profound sectional divisions within the country.

The Aftermath and the Path to Civil War

Lincoln’s election was a signal to many in the South that their position in the Union was untenable. Southern leaders argued that Lincoln’s victory represented a triumph of anti-slavery forces and feared it would eventually lead to the abolition of slavery. South Carolina, the most ardent defender of states' rights and slavery, led the way by seceding from the Union on December 20, 1860, just weeks after Lincoln’s victory. Other Southern states soon followed, forming the Confederate States of America by February 1861, with Jefferson Davis as their president.

Lincoln, however, had not yet taken office, and outgoing President James Buchanan maintained a passive stance, claiming he lacked the authority to prevent secession. As the nation descended into chaos, Lincoln remained committed to preserving the Union. In his inaugural address on March 4, 1861, Lincoln sought to reassure the South that he would not interfere with slavery where it existed. But he made it clear that secession was unacceptable, stating, "We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies."

Despite Lincoln’s attempts at conciliation, the South viewed his election as an existential threat. The Confederate attack on Fort Sumter in April 1861 marked the beginning of the Civil War. The election of 1860 had exposed the fault lines in American society and set the stage for a conflict that would ultimately decide the fate of the Union and the institution of slavery.

The Legacy of the 1860 Election

The election of 1860 remains one of the most consequential in American history. It underscored the deep and irreconcilable divisions between the North and South over slavery and states' rights. Lincoln’s election demonstrated the power of a unified political movement, but it also revealed the dangers of a fragmented political system. The split within the Democratic Party had made Lincoln’s victory possible, but it also highlighted how sectional divisions could destabilize the political landscape.

Lincoln’s election and the subsequent Civil War would bring about the end of slavery in the United States and redefine the nation’s identity. The principles of liberty, equality, and federal authority were profoundly tested in the years that followed, but they ultimately prevailed, reshaping the American nation in ways that are still felt today. Lincoln’s leadership and his vision of a united country became an enduring symbol of resilience, one that helped guide the nation through its darkest hours. The election of 1860 thus marked not just a change in leadership, but a seismic shift in American society and governance, one that would pave the way for a new, more inclusive future.

Share this

Earthisone