L1 vs. L2 Regularization: Key Differences, Applications, and Practical Considerations in Machine Learning

L1 vs. L2 Regularization in Machine Learning: A Detailed Explanation

Regularization is a crucial technique in machine learning used to prevent overfitting—a scenario where a model performs exceptionally well on training data but poorly on unseen data. Among the most widely used regularization methods are L1 (Lasso) and L2 (Ridge) regularization, each with distinct mathematical properties, effects on model weights, and practical applications. Understanding their differences is essential for selecting the right approach for a given problem.

The Concept of Regularization

Before diving into L1 and L2, it’s important to understand why regularization is needed. Machine learning models, especially complex ones like deep neural networks or high-degree polynomial regressions, can memorize training data instead of learning generalizable patterns. This leads to overfitting, where the model fails to perform well on new, unseen data.

Regularization introduces a penalty term to the loss function, discouraging the model from assigning excessively large weights to features. This helps in:

• Reducing overfitting by simplifying the model.

• Improving generalization by ensuring the model does not rely too heavily on any single feature.

• Enhancing interpretability (especially with L1) by eliminating irrelevant features.

Both L1 and L2 achieve this by modifying the loss function, but they do so in fundamentally different ways.

Mathematical Formulation of L1 and L2 Regularization

Standard Loss Function Without Regularization

A typical machine learning model minimizes a loss function, such as Mean Squared Error (MSE) for regression or Cross-Entropy Loss for classification:

$$\text{Loss}=\frac{1}{N}\sum _{i=1}^N(y_i-{\widehat{y}}_i{)}^2$$

where: $y_i$= true value, ${\widehat{y}}_i$ = predicted value, $N$ = number of samples.

Loss Function with L1 (Lasso) Regularization

L1 regularization adds the sum of absolute weights to the loss function:

$${\text{Loss}}_{L1}=\frac{1}{N}\sum _{i=1}^N(y_i-{\widehat{y}}_i{)}^2+\lambda \sum _{j=1}^p\mathrm{\mid }{w}_j\mathrm{\mid }$$

where: $w_j$ = model weights, $\lambda$= regularization strength (hyperparameter), $p$ = number of features.

Loss Function with L2 (Ridge) Regularization

L2 regularization adds the sum of squared weights to the loss function:

$${\text{Loss}}_{L2}=\frac{1}{N}\sum _{i=1}^N(y_i-{\widehat{y}}_i{)}^2+\lambda \sum _{j=1}^p{w}_j^2$$

The key difference lies in how they penalize weights:

• L1 penalizes absolute values, leading to sparse solutions (some weights become exactly zero).

• L2 penalizes squared values, leading to small but non-zero weights.

Key Differences Between L1 and L2 Regularization

(A) Effect on Model Weights

• L1 (Lasso) tends to produce sparse models by driving some weights to exactly zero. This is useful for feature selection, as it effectively removes irrelevant features.

• L2 (Ridge) shrinks weights proportionally but rarely reduces them to zero. It distributes the penalty across all weights, making them small but non-zero.

Why does L1 lead to sparsity?
The L1 penalty has sharp corners at the axes in weight space, meaning the optimal solution often lies where some weights are zero. In contrast, L2’s penalty is smooth, leading to a more distributed reduction in weights.

(B) Robustness to Outliers

• L1 is more robust to outliers because the absolute error is less sensitive to extreme values.

• L2 is less robust because squaring large errors amplifies their impact.

(C) Computational Efficiency

• L1 is computationally more expensive for optimization because the absolute value function is not differentiable at zero. Solvers like coordinate descent or proximal gradient methods are often used.

• L2 has a closed-form solution and is easier to optimize using gradient descent since the squared term is differentiable everywhere.

(D) Geometric Interpretation

• L1 regularization corresponds to a diamond-shaped constraint (L1-norm ball) in weight space. The optimal solution often lies at a corner, where some weights are zero.

• L2 regularization corresponds to a circular constraint (L2-norm ball), leading to a smooth shrinkage of weights.
  

When to Use L1 vs. L2 Regularization?

Use L1 (Lasso) When:

• Feature selection is needed (e.g., high-dimensional datasets where only a few features matter).

• The model needs interpretability (removing irrelevant features simplifies the model).

• The data has outliers, and robustness is important.

Example:
In genetic data analysis, where thousands of genes may influence a disease, L1 helps identify the few significant ones.

Use L2 (Ridge) When:

• All features are potentially relevant, and you want to avoid eliminating any.

• Multicollinearity exists (highly correlated features), as L2 stabilizes weight distribution.

• The dataset is not extremely high-dimensional.

Example:
In house price prediction, where features like size, location, and age all contribute, L2 ensures no single feature dominates.

Elastic Net: Combining L1 and L2

In practice, a hybrid approach called Elastic Net combines both penalties:

$${\text{Loss}}_{\text{Elastic Net}}=\frac{1}{N}\sum _{i=1}^N(y_i-{\widehat{y}}_i{)}^2+{\lambda }_1\sum _{j=1}^p\mathrm{\mid }{w}_j\mathrm{\mid }+{\lambda }_2\sum _{j=1}^p{w}_j^2$$

This is useful when:

• There are many correlated features (L2 helps stabilize weights).

• Some features should be eliminated (L1 induces sparsity).
  

Practical Considerations

Choosing the Regularization Strength (λ)

• A high λ increases penalty, leading to stronger regularization (simpler models).

• A low λ reduces regularization, allowing more complex models.

• Hyperparameter tuning (e.g., cross-validation) is crucial to find the optimal λ.

Impact on Deep Learning

• L2 (weight decay) is widely used in deep learning to prevent overfitting.

• L1 is less common in deep networks due to computational challenges but can be used for neuron pruning.

Scalability

• L2 is more scalable for large datasets due to efficient gradient-based optimization.

• L1 requires specialized solvers for high-dimensional data.

Conclusion

L1 and L2 regularization are fundamental techniques to prevent overfitting, but they serve different purposes:

• L1 (Lasso) is ideal for feature selection and sparse models.

• L2 (Ridge) is better for general shrinkage and handling multicollinearity.

• Elastic Net provides a balanced approach when both properties are needed.

Choosing between them depends on the problem’s nature, dataset structure, and desired model interpretability. Proper tuning of regularization strength ensures a model that generalizes well without sacrificing predictive power.

Photo from depositphotos

Share this

Google Facebook Twitter More

• Digg
• Linkedin
• Stumbleupon
• Delicious
• Tumblr
• BufferApp
• Pocket
• Evernote

Earthisone