International Newspaper Carrier Day: History, Significance and Modern Celebrations

International Newspaper Carrier Day: Honoring the Dedication and Evolution of News Delivery on October 11th

International Newspaper Carrier Day is a significant annual observance that honors the dedication and essential contributions of the individuals who deliver newspapers to our homes and businesses. This day provides a moment for communities, publishers, and readers to express gratitude for the carriers who ensure the timely flow of information, often braving early hours and inclement weather. The following comprehensive exploration delves into the complete details of this special day, examining its history, purpose, celebration, and evolving relevance in the modern digital age, weaving together a complete narrative of this unique tribute.

📜 The Historical Roots and Official Establishment

The story of International Newspaper Carrier Day is deeply intertwined with the history of newspaper distribution itself. The profession can be traced back to 1833 with a pivotal event in New York City. Benjamin Day, the publisher of the New York Sun, placed an advertisement seeking "steady men" to distribute his paper. Surprisingly, it was a ten-year-old boy named Barney Flaherty who responded and was hired, thereby becoming the world's first recognized newspaper carrier, or "paperboy" . This moment marked the beginning of a tradition where young people, often on foot or bicycle, took on the responsibility of delivering the news, learning lessons in punctuality, responsibility, and customer service along the way .

While the role itself is centuries old, the formal recognition of these workers is a more recent development. International Newspaper Carrier Day was officially established in the early 1990s, with the Newspaper Association of America (NAA) playing a key role in its creation . The day was strategically placed on the calendar to coincide with National Newspaper Week, a broader celebration of the newspaper industry's impact on communities across North America . Specifically, International Newspaper Carrier Day is observed on the Saturday of the first full week of October. For 2025, this falls on Saturday, October 11. It is important to note that some sources reference a separate "Newspaper Carrier Day" on September 4th, which specifically honors the anniversary of Barney Flaherty's hiring, but the internationally recognized day in October has a broader scope and official industry backing.

🗓️ The Purpose and Profound Significance

The establishment of International Newspaper Carrier Day serves multiple profound purposes that go beyond a simple "thank you."

Recognition of Unsung Heroes: At its core, the day is a formal acknowledgment of the carriers' tireless efforts. It celebrates their dedication, punctuality, and resilience in the face of challenges like harsh weather, dark mornings, and logistical difficulties. These individuals are the final, crucial link in the chain of journalism, ensuring that the work of reporters and editors physically reaches the public.

Promotion of Community and Literacy: By highlighting the physical newspaper, the day indirectly promotes literacy and the habit of staying informed through reliable journalism. Newspapers are a vital source of local news, and carriers help sustain this ecosystem. Furthermore, carriers often become familiar figures in their neighborhoods, fostering a tangible sense of community connection that is increasingly rare in the digital world.

A Nod to Tradition in a Digital Age: In an era dominated by instant digital news, International Newspaper Carrier Day emphasizes the value and persistence of traditional print media . It honors the "human touch" behind news delivery and serves as a reminder of the discipline and work ethic associated with the job, which for many young people was their first introduction to the responsibilities of employment.

🎉 How the Day is Celebrated

The celebrations for International Newspaper Carrier Day are diverse, ranging from industry-led initiatives to personal gestures of appreciation from the public.

Industry and Organizational Actions: Newspaper publishers and industry alliances play a significant role. The News/Media Alliance, for instance, produces special appreciation ads that member newspapers can run in their print editions on or around October 11th. These ads are often accompanied by feature articles that shine a spotlight on long-serving or exceptional carriers, sharing their stories with the community . Some newspapers or distribution companies may also host appreciation events, such as award ceremonies or breakfasts, and provide certificates or bonuses to their delivery staff.

Community and Individual Participation: The public is encouraged to join in the celebration through simple but meaningful actions. One of the most direct ways to show gratitude is by leaving a thank-you note, a small gift, or a tip for one's newspaper carrier . Another popular modern gesture is to post a tribute on social media using hashtags like #NewspaperCarrierDay or #ThankYouCarrier to raise awareness and share appreciation publicly . A more nostalgic way to mark the day is by playing the classic video game "Paperboy," which offers a lighthearted simulation of the challenges a carrier might face . Finally, simply taking a moment to verbally thank the carrier or educating children about the importance of this service are small but powerful ways to participate.

🌍 The Global Reach and Evolving Profession

Although International Newspaper Carrier Day originated in the United States, its observance has expanded to other nations with strong newspaper traditions. Celebrations are also well-documented in Canada, the United Kingdom, India, Australia, and the Philippines, among others . While the scale of celebration may vary, the universal message of gratitude and recognition for the carriers' role in information dissemination remains constant.

The profession of newspaper carrying has also evolved significantly. What was once a role predominantly filled by young boys on bicycles is now often a job held by adults who use cars to cover larger suburban routes . This shift reflects changes in urban planning and the declining circulation of print newspapers due to the rise of digital media . Despite these challenges, newspaper carriers continue to be an essential workforce, particularly in areas with limited digital access and for demographics that prefer the tactile experience of a physical newspaper . The day acknowledges this evolution while honoring the enduring spirit of the service.

💫 A Lasting Tribute to Daily Dedication

International Newspaper Carrier Day stands as a meaningful annual tribute to the often-overlooked individuals who form a critical bridge between the newsroom and the public. From its historical beginnings with a single ten-year-old boy in New York to its current status as an internationally recognized observance, the day encapsulates a deep appreciation for dedication, reliability, and community service. It reminds us that behind every morning headline that lands on a doorstep, there is a story of human effort and commitment. As the media landscape continues to transform, this day ensures that the vital contributions of these daily messengers of information are not forgotten but are instead celebrated with the respect and gratitude they truly deserve.

International Day of the Girl Child: History, Significance and Global Challenges

International Day of the Girl Child, a UN-declared observance dedicated to empowering girls worldwide.

The International Day of the Girl Child, observed every year on October 11, is a pivotal global observance dedicated to celebrating the power and potential of girls everywhere, while also drawing urgent attention to the unique challenges and human rights violations they face. Established by the United Nations, this day serves as both a rallying cry and a call to action to advance girls' rights, empower their leadership, and dismantle the systemic barriers that hold them back. It is a day to recognize that girls are not passive victims of circumstance but active agents of change, whose voices and solutions are critical to building a more equitable and prosperous world. The following sections will provide a comprehensive exploration of this significant day, from its historical origins and thematic evolution to the pressing issues it confronts and the concrete actions everyone can take to support the girl child.

The Historical Foundation and Establishment of the Day

The journey to establishing the International Day of the Girl Child is a testament to years of dedicated advocacy and a growing recognition within the global community that girls occupy a distinct and often overlooked position in development and human rights agendas. While long-standing observances existed for women and children, there was a clear gap in recognizing the specific, intersectional discrimination faced by girls simply for being both young and female . The intellectual and advocacy groundwork was laid in 1995 at the World Conference on Women in Beijing. It was here that countries unanimously adopted the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, which stands as the most progressive blueprint ever for advancing women's rights and, notably, was the first such document to specifically call out the rights of girls . This declaration marked a paradigm shift, moving girls from the periphery to the center of the global gender equality conversation.

The direct campaign for an international day was spearheaded by the non-governmental organization Plan International as a central part of its "Because I Am a Girl" campaign . This initiative was designed to focus specifically on supporting girls in developing countries, lifting them out of poverty, and promoting their rights. Plan International, working closely with girls themselves, believed that a dedicated international day could serve as a powerful launchpad to focus global attention on the systemic neglect of girls in policy and programming. Their campaign successfully built a coalition of support, which led them to the Canadian government. Canada, under the sponsorship of Rona Ambrose, then Minister for the Status of Women, formally proposed the day as a resolution to the United Nations General Assembly . This diplomatic effort culminated on December 19, 2011, when the UN General Assembly voted to adopt Resolution 66/170, officially declaring October 11 as the International Day of the Girl Child, with the first observance held in 2012 .

The resolution itself eloquently captures the day's purpose, stating that it recognizes the "empowerment of and investment in girls" as critical for economic growth, the achievement of all development goals, and the breaking of "the cycle of discrimination and violence" . It further affirms that empowering girls requires their active participation in decision-making processes. Since its inaugural celebration, each year has been guided by a specific theme, focusing global attention on different facets of girls' lives, from education and ending child marriage to innovating for their empowerment in crisis situations, thereby ensuring the day remains a dynamic and evolving platform for advocacy .

The 2025 Theme: "The Girl I Am, The Change I Lead"

The theme for the International Day of the Girl Child in 2025 is a powerful and evocative declaration: "The girl I am, the change I lead: Girls on the frontlines of crisis" . This theme was not developed in a vacuum; it was shaped through extensive consultations with girl-led organizations, UN partners, and, most importantly, with girls themselves . It represents a direct call to see girls not merely for the challenges and crises they endure but for their inherent identity, agency, and capacity to lead transformative solutions. The theme deliberately positions girls as active leaders on the frontlines of various global crises, whether they be climate-related disasters, political conflicts, or public health emergencies. It challenges the pervasive narrative of girls as passive victims and reframes them as indispensable architects of a better future.

This theme carries profound significance, particularly in 2025, as it marks thirty years since the landmark Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action . This anniversary serves as a moment for critical reflection on the progress made and the daunting gaps that remain. The 2025 theme acts as a rallying cry to honor the spirit of Beijing by finally listening to girls and recognizing their limitless potential. It underscores the idea that girls are not waiting for a better world to be handed to them; they are actively building it through their courage, innovation, and unwavering resolve in the face of adversity . The theme invites the world to move beyond sympathy and toward solid partnership, amplifying the solutions girls are already crafting in their communities and ensuring their voices are not just heard but are central to policymaking and humanitarian response .

The Persistent Global Challenges Facing Girls Today

Despite decades of advocacy and progress, adolescent girls continue to confront a myriad of interconnected and severe challenges that violate their fundamental rights and restrict their life choices. The data and statistics reveal a sobering picture of the obstacles that must be overcome.

⚠️ Education in Peril

Education, widely acknowledged as a fundamental driver of empowerment, remains out of reach for millions of girls. Globally, an estimated 133 million girls are out of school . The situation deteriorates further during adolescence. Girls aged 15-19 are twice as likely as boys to be not in education, employment, or training (NEET) . In fragile and conflict-affected settings, this disparity is even more pronounced, with girls nearly 90% more likely to be out of school than their peers in stable environments . Furthermore, almost four in ten adolescent girls and young women do not finish upper secondary school, severely limiting their future opportunities .

💔 Violence and Harmful Practices

Girls are subjected to shocking levels of violence and harmful traditional practices. Nearly one in four ever-married or partnered adolescent girls aged 15-19 has experienced intimate partner violence in their lifetimes . Perhaps even more alarming is the pervasive acceptance of such violence, with more than one third of adolescent girls and boys aged 15-19 considering a husband justified in hitting his wife under certain circumstances . Child marriage remains a widespread crisis, with one in five young women aged 20-24 married as children . In fragile settings, these rates are almost double the global average, as crisis and displacement increase economic desperation and insecurity, pushing families to marry off their daughters at a young age . Plan International's 2025 report, "Let me be a child, not a wife," powerfully centers the voices of 251 girls and young women from 15 countries who have lived through the trauma of child marriage, revealing the urgent need to end this practice .

😔 Health and Well-being at Risk

The physical and mental well-being of girls is under threat. In the last two decades, self-harm has been a leading cause of death among adolescent girls globally, pointing to a silent crisis in mental health . Access to quality healthcare, including sexual and reproductive health services, remains limited for many, impacting their well-being and futures. The statistics on female genital mutilation (FGM) are also steadily increasing, with about 3 million girls at risk each year . These challenges are often compounded in crisis situations, which significantly increase the risks of sexual violence and maternal mortality for girls .

A Clarion Call to Action: How to Make a Difference

Recognizing these challenges, the International Day of the Girl Child is fundamentally about inspiring and mobilizing action. The UN, UNICEF, and other leading agencies have outlined several concrete ways that individuals, communities, and governments can contribute to advancing girls' rights.

📢 Amplify Girls' Voices

One of the most direct actions is to actively share girls' stories and celebrate their achievements. Use your platforms, whether on social media or in community gatherings, to amplify their voices and perspectives . When sharing, use official hashtags like #DayOfTheGirl or #BrighterFutureForGirls to connect with the global movement . This also involves simply listening to girls and taking their ideas and solutions seriously.

🏛️ Advocate for Policy Change

Individual actions must be coupled with systemic change. Citizens can advocate for policies and legislation that protect girls' rights and enable their leadership . This includes calling for and supporting laws that end child marriage, ensure equal access to education, and provide dedicated funding for programs that meet the unique needs of girls, especially those in crisis situations—including support for their health, education, and mental well-being .

🏠 Create Girl-Led Spaces

Wherever one has influence—in a school, community center, or youth club—it is crucial to support the creation of safe, girl-led spaces . These are environments where girls can connect with one another, learn, access support services, and build their skills and confidence without fear of discrimination or violence. These spaces are essential for fostering a sense of agency and collective power.

🌍 Support Vulnerable Girls Globally

Supporting reputable organizations that work directly with and for girls is a tangible way to make a difference. This can be through financial donations, volunteering, or raising awareness about their work. Many organizations, such as ChildFund and Plan International, offer opportunities to sponsor a girl or contribute to scholarships, providing direct support for their education and empowerment . As noted, even sending remittances to support girls' education or family-run businesses in other countries can be a powerful form of direct aid .

The Unwavering Importance of the Observance

The International Day of the Girl Child is far more than a symbolic gesture on the global calendar. Its importance is profound and multi-layered. First, it works intentionally to eliminate deep-seated gender-based issues that have been passed down through generations, making visible the often-invisible struggles and discrimination that girls face daily . By focusing a spotlight on these issues, the day challenges archaic patriarchal mindsets and pushes for a cultural and structural shift.

Second, the day is fundamentally about empowerment. It sends a powerful message to girls everywhere that they matter, that their dreams are valid, and that their potential is limitless. It is a day that specifically highlights the rights of young girls who are often silenced, helping to build their self-esteem and conviction that they can be and achieve anything . This empowerment has a ripple effect, as empowered girls inevitably grow into empowered women who can contribute more fully to the social, economic, and political life of their communities . Investing in a girl's youth is an investment in a more enlightened and equitable future for all of society.

Finally, the observance is intrinsically linked to the broader global framework of sustainable development. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and its 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) explicitly aim to leave no one behind. Achieving gender equality and the empowerment of all women and girls is not only a standalone goal (SDG 5) but is also integral to the achievement of all the other goals, from poverty eradication to climate action . The International Day of the Girl Child is thus a critical annual checkpoint to assess progress, rally political will, and accelerate actions to ensure that the world's girls are not left behind but are instead recognized as equal partners in solving the planet's most pressing challenges.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the International Day of the Girl Child stands as a vital global moment of reflection, celebration, and mobilization. From its historical roots in the Beijing Declaration and the persistent advocacy of organizations like Plan International, to the powerful, girl-led theme of 2025, this day encapsulates a continuous struggle and an enduring hope. It forces the world to confront the harsh realities of educational deprivation, violence, and discrimination that millions of girls face, while simultaneously celebrating their indomitable spirit, leadership, and capacity to drive positive change. The day is a compelling reminder that supporting girls is not merely an act of charity but a strategic imperative for a just and sustainable future. It calls upon every one of us—governments, organizations, communities, and individuals—to listen, to act, and to invest. For when a girl is safe, educated, and empowered, she doesn't just transform her own life; she transforms her family, her community, and ultimately, the entire world.

Photo from: iStock

The Inauguration of Australia's First University: The Founding and Early History of the University of Sydney in 1852.

The Inauguration of Australia's First University: A Detailed Account of the University of Sydney's Founding on October 11, 1852.

The University of Sydney holds the distinguished title of being Australia's first university . Its inauguration on October 11, 1852, was far more than a local ceremony; it was a landmark event that represented a profound transformation for the colony of New South Wales. Established on the principles of academic merit and secularism, the university was a bold experiment and a testament to the ambitions of a rapidly evolving society. This moment marked the birth of an institution that would become an "ornament and a blessing to these ends of the earth" .

The Colonial Context and the Push for a University

In the first half of the 19th century, the Australian colonies faced a significant intellectual and professional deficit. Young colonists who sought higher education were compelled to undertake the long, hazardous, and expensive journey to Britain or Europe . This barrier meant that many potential students forewent university education, depriving the colony of a highly educated workforce essential for its development . As New South Wales moved towards self-government, the need for locally educated engineers, lawyers, doctors, and civil servants became increasingly apparent.

Before 1850, attempts to establish higher learning institutions had met with limited success. Private colleges, such as John Dunmore Lang's Australian College and the non-denominational Sydney College, were founded but struggled financially, particularly during the economic depression of the 1840s . The impending collapse of Sydney College prompted its proprietors to petition the government to convert it into a university, directly setting the stage for political action.

The prime mover behind this action was William Charles Wentworth, a Cambridge alumnus and member of the New South Wales Legislative Council . In 1849, he successfully moved for a Select Committee to investigate the establishment of a university endowed at public expense . The committee's report recommended founding a university "upon a liberal and comprehensive basis... which shall be accessible to all classes" . Wentworth championed a revolutionary idea for the time: that admission should be based on academic merit, established through written examination, rather than a student's religious affiliation or social status . This was a deliberate move to create an inclusive institution that would serve the entire community.

The Founding Legislation and a Secular Compromise

A bill to incorporate the university was first introduced in October 1849 but was lost due to significant disagreement over the composition of the university's governing senate . The central point of contention was religion. Religious organizations advocated for a university modeled on Oxford and Cambridge, which were deeply entwined with the Church of England . In contrast, supporters of a secular model pointed to the University of London, which excluded religious qualifications for entry.

The initial bill had excluded clergy from sitting on the senate, which proved unacceptable to many . A political compromise was eventually reached: the senate would include representation for the main Christian denominations, but no single sect would dominate . The revised bill, the University of Sydney Act 1850 (NSW), was passed by the Legislative Council and received assent from Governor Sir Charles FitzRoy on 1 October 1850, legally bringing the university into existence.

The Act was groundbreaking. Its preamble stated that the university was to hold forth "to all classes and denominations of Her Majesty’s subjects resident in the Colony of New South Wales, without any distinction whatsoever, an encouragement of pursuing a regular and liberal course of education" . Crucially, it specified that "no religious test shall be administered to any person in order to entitle him to be admitted as a Student ... or to hold any office therein" . This secular and inclusive character was a pragmatic solution for a diverse colony and made the University of Sydney one of the first public, non-denominational, and secular universities in the entire British Empire.

The Inauguration: A "Memorable Day in the Annals of Australia"

Following the Act, 16 Fellows were appointed to the first Senate, which held its inaugural meeting on 3 February 1851 . The Senate immediately began its work, advertising in England for professors and taking over the building of the defunct Sydney College in College Street, which now houses Sydney Grammar School.

In 1852, the university's first academics arrived: the Reverend Dr. John Woolley as Principal and Professor of Classics; Morris Birkbeck Pell as Professor of Mathematics; and Dr. John Smith as Professor of Chemistry and Experimental Philosophy . On 4 October 1852, the first matriculation examination was held, and 24 candidates passed . A week later, on 11 October 1852, the formal inauguration ceremony was held in the Big Schoolroom of the former Sydney College building.

Contemporary accounts describe it as a grand occasion, attended by the "assembled rank, intelligence, and beauty" of Sydney . The ceremony was imbued with a sense of historical significance and colonial pride. As one report noted, it was "a memorable day in the annals of Australia," which saw the inauguration of "the first Colonial University in the British Empire" . The speeches by Vice-Provost Sir Charles Nicholson and Professor Woolley reflected on the colony's rapid transformation from a "lately abject and despised colony" to a place establishing an institution for "high intellectual culture" . They eloquently defended the university's secular foundation as the only system possible for a legislature and population divided into many creeds, ensuring all sects could participate equally in its benefits . Following the addresses, the 24 successful matriculates were formally enrolled as the university's first students.

Building an Enduring Institution: The Move to Grose Farm

The university began teaching immediately from the old Sydney College building, but it was soon clear that a larger, more suitable site was needed . In 1853, the government offered a 128-acre tract of land about two miles west of the city, known as Grose Farm—an area then considered remote and "in the wilds of the bush" . This land, on the Camperdown/Darlington ridge, was the traditional land of the Cadigal people of the Eora Nation.

The Colonial Architect, Edmund Blacket, was commissioned to design the university's first buildings. He chose the Gothic Revival style, inspired by the quadrangles of Oxford and Cambridge, and used local Pyrmont sandstone . Construction began in 1854, and by 1857, the professors and their students moved into the new building, now known as the eastern range of the Quadrangle . The imposing Main Building, with its iconic Great Tower completed by 1862, stood as a powerful symbol of the senate's far-sighted vision for a "noble and enduring institution".

To address the concerns of religious groups about the secular nature of the university, the model of affiliated residential colleges was adopted . The Affiliated Colleges Act of 1854 allowed major Christian denominations to establish colleges that would provide residence, religious instruction, and tutorial support for students, while the university itself remained secular . St Paul's (Anglican, 1858), St John's (Roman Catholic, 1862), and St Andrew's (Presbyterian, 1876) were among the first to be established, creating a collegiate system that continues to this day.

Early Curriculum, Challenges and Milestones

The university's initial curriculum reflected the classical traditions of European universities but also showed a progressive bent. Students could study classics, sciences, and mathematics, as well as 'modern' subjects like French, German, and political philosophy . The first degrees were awarded in 1856 .

Growth in the early decades was slow. From the initial 24 students in 1852, enrolment had only reached about 70 by 1871 . The university faced criticism for its high cost relative to its small number of students . However, its founding principles soon led to another world-first innovation. In 1881, at the urging of Chancellor Sir William Manning, the senate resolved to admit women on the same basis as men . The first women, Mary Elizabeth Brown and Isola Florence Thompson, began their Bachelor of Arts studies in 1882 and graduated in 1885, becoming the first women to earn degrees from the university . This made the University of Sydney one of the first universities in the world to admit women equally, and its medical school admitted the first women medical students in Australia in 1884.

A major turning point came with the announcement of the Challis Bequest. Upon his death, businessman John Henry Challis left the majority of his estate, eventually amounting to about £250,000 (equivalent to tens of millions today), to the university . This massive private benefaction, received in 1890, stimulated the government to increase its funding and allowed the university to expand dramatically, creating new professorships in fields like anatomy, zoology, engineering, history, and law . Similarly, the Thomas Fisher bequest of 1885 provided a foundation for what would become the university's library, one of the largest in the Southern Hemisphere.

A Lasting Legacy

The inauguration of the University of Sydney in 1852 was the culmination of a visionary effort to create a center of learning that was both accessible and excellent. Its founding principles of secularism and admission based on academic merit challenged the conventions of the age and laid the groundwork for a uniquely democratic institution . From its first 24 students, the university has grown to educate generations of leaders, including prime ministers, Nobel laureates, and pioneers in every field . The "memorable day" of its inauguration truly marked the beginning of an intellectual tradition that continues to shape Australia and the world, fulfilling the hopes of its founders that it would for ages be "an ornament and a blessing" to the nation .

Photo from: Unsplash

World Mental Health Day: Its History, Significance, and Global Impact.

World Mental Health Day: History, Significance and Global Impact

World Mental Health Day, observed annually on October 10th, is a pivotal global event dedicated to raising awareness about mental health issues, mobilizing efforts in support of mental health, and, crucially, challenging the pervasive social stigma that surrounds mental illness . Established in 1992 by the World Federation for Mental Health (WFMH), the day has evolved from a broad advocacy campaign into a focused movement that addresses specific themes each year, uniting stakeholders from over 150 countries in a shared mission to make mental health a priority for people worldwide . In an era where global crises, from conflicts to pandemics, increasingly underscore the profound interconnectedness of human well-being, this day serves as an annual reminder that mental health is an indispensable component of overall health and a basic human right. The day provides a unified platform for mental health professionals, policymakers, survivors, and the general public to engage in open dialogues, share resources, and advocate for policies that ensure mental health care is accessible to all, irrespective of their geographical location or socioeconomic status .

The Genesis and Evolution of a Global Movement

The inception of World Mental Health Day traces back to 1992, launched under the initiative of Deputy Secretary General Richard C. Hunter of the World Federation for Mental Health . In its nascent years, the observance lacked a specific theme, functioning primarily as a general campaign for global mental health advocacy and public education. The initial activities, though modest, were ambitious in scope; the very first celebration in 1992 featured a two-hour global broadcast from Florida, with live telephone participation from several countries including England, Australia, Chile, and Zambia, alongside pre-taped segments from Geneva and Atlanta . This early effort demonstrated a clear and growing international interest in breaking the silence on mental health.

A significant transformation occurred in 1994, under the leadership of then Secretary-General Eugene Brody, when the day was celebrated with its first dedicated theme: "Improving the Quality of Mental Health Services throughout the World" . This shift to an annual theme provided a powerful focus for global efforts, allowing for deeper exploration and mobilization around specific issues. Over the subsequent decades, these themes have reflected the evolving understanding and priorities of the global mental health landscape. Past themes have spotlighted various demographics and issues, such as "Women and Mental Health" (1996), "Children and Mental Health" (1997), "Mental Health and Aging" (1999), and "Depression: A Global Crisis" (2012) . More recent themes have continued to address contemporary challenges, including "Mental Health in the Workplace" (2017), "Young People and Mental Health in a Changing World" (2018), and "Mental Health is a Universal Human Right" (2023) . This thematic evolution not only charts the history of the movement but also highlights the persistent efforts to address mental health from multiple angles—through the lenses of human rights, public investment, suicide prevention, and the unique needs of diverse populations.

The Theme for 2025: A Focus on Mental Health in Humanitarian Emergencies

The chosen theme for World Mental Health Day 2025 is "Mental Health in Humanitarian Emergencies" or, as alternatively framed by the World Federation for Mental Health, "Access to Services – Mental Health in Catastrophes and Emergencies" . This theme directs global attention to the urgent mental health and psychosocial needs of populations affected by devastating crises, such as armed conflicts, natural disasters, and public health emergencies . These events cause immense suffering, displacing families, fracturing communities, and inflicting deep emotional wounds that can long outlast the restoration of physical safety and infrastructure.

The statistics are staggering. It is estimated that nearly one in five people living in conflict-affected areas has a mental health condition . Furthermore, by the end of 2024, over 123 million people were forcibly displaced worldwide, with a overwhelming 71% hosted in low- and middle-income countries where healthcare systems are already strained and access to mental health services is extremely limited . The theme for 2025 emphasizes that in these contexts, providing food, water, and shelter is not enough. Mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) are equally critical for helping individuals cope with trauma, heal from loss, and gather the strength to recover and rebuild their lives and communities . This focus calls for a concerted effort to integrate MHPSS as a core component of humanitarian response, ensuring that the most vulnerable, including refugees, internally displaced persons, children, and persons with disabilities, have access to the support they need.

The Profound Significance and Impact of the Day

World Mental Health Day holds profound significance in the global health calendar, fulfilling several critical functions that extend far beyond a single day of awareness. First and foremost, it acts as a powerful tool for destigmatization and normalization. Despite advancements in understanding, mental illness remains shrouded in stigma, misconception, and discrimination in many societies. This stigma often prevents individuals from acknowledging their struggles and seeking help, leading to isolation and prolonged suffering . World Mental Health Day actively counters this by encouraging open conversations, sharing personal stories of resilience, and disseminating accurate information. It sends a unifying message that experiencing mental health challenges is a common human response to stress and adversity, not a sign of weakness or a character flaw, and that seeking help is an act of courage.

Secondly, the day serves as a crucial catalyst for global advocacy and policy change. It provides a unified platform for organizations like the World Health Organization and the WFMH to mobilize stakeholders, release technical guidelines, and call upon governments to increase investment in mental health services . For instance, the day has been marked by significant political announcements, such as in 2018 when UK Prime Minister Theresa May appointed the country's first suicide prevention minister during a global mental health summit . This advocacy is desperately needed, as nations on average spend less than 2% of their health budgets on mental health, and nearly one billion people living in lower-income countries are combating mental health conditions with scarce resources.

Finally, World Mental Health Day plays an essential role in public education and resource dissemination. Each year, the campaign equips the public, healthcare professionals, and community leaders with knowledge and tools. For example, the WHO publishes resources like the "Mental Health and Psychosocial Support Minimum Service Package" and guides such as "Doing What Matters in Times of Stress" . These materials provide evidence-based strategies for managing stress, offering psychological first aid, and supporting others in distress, thereby building a more informed and resilient global community.

Key Messages and Calls to Action for 2025

Aligned with its urgent theme, the key messages for World Mental Health Day 2025 center around integration, inclusion, and investment. A central call to action is for the integration of mental health and psychosocial support into all emergency response plans . This means making MHPSS a standard and funded component of humanitarian aid, alongside traditional medical and logistical support. Such integration not only addresses immediate suffering but also strengthens community resilience and lays the groundwork for more robust health systems in the future.

Another critical message underscores the necessity of inclusive and accessible care. Support must be designed to reach the most vulnerable groups, who are often disproportionately affected in crises. This includes children, older persons, persons with disabilities, refugees, and those with pre-existing mental health conditions . Achieving this requires actively addressing barriers such as stigma, discrimination, cost, and language, ensuring that help is available to everyone who needs it.

The 2025 campaign also emphasizes that investing in mental health is an investment in overall recovery. Providing mental health support helps individuals regain their functionality, allows families to stabilize, and enables communities and economies to recover more effectively from crises . This investment builds long-term resilience, helping societies better withstand future shocks. A related and vital message focuses on protecting the well-being of humanitarian workers. These frontline responders are exposed to extreme stress and are often directly impacted by the crises they work in. Organizations are called upon to provide these essential workers with adequate rest, supervision, peer support, and workplace mental health programs to sustain an effective humanitarian response.

On an individual level, the campaign encourages everyone to protect their own mental health, especially during difficult times. Practical advice includes prioritizing connections with loved ones, maintaining routines as much as possible, engaging in physical activity, minimizing alcohol use, and seeking support from trusted friends, family, or health professionals when needed .

Recognizing the Signs and Offering Support

A fundamental aspect of mental health literacy, which World Mental Health Day promotes, is the ability to recognize the signs of mental distress in oneself and others. These signs can manifest emotionally, physically, and behaviorally.

Emotional signs may include persistent sadness, hopelessness, or a numb feeling; intense irritability and unexplained mood swings; and excessive anxiety, worry, or fear that interferes with daily life . A noticeable loss of interest or pleasure in activities, hobbies, and social interactions that were once enjoyable is also a common indicator .

Physical signs are often overlooked but are equally important. These can encompass chronic fatigue and low energy despite getting adequate rest; significant changes in sleep patterns (insomnia or oversleeping) or appetite; and unexplained physical ailments such as headaches, digestive problems, or muscle tension .

Behavioral signs might involve a decline in performance at work or school; social withdrawal and isolation from friends and family; an increased reliance on alcohol, drugs, or smoking as a coping mechanism; and neglect of personal responsibilities, including daily chores and personal hygiene.

Knowing how to support someone who may be struggling is equally critical. Effective support can begin with simply listening without judgment, offering a safe and empathetic space for them to share their feelings . It is important to show patience and ask what would help them, rather than making assumptions . Avoiding confrontation and simply being available can make a significant difference. Perhaps most importantly, you can gently encourage them to seek professional help from a doctor, therapist, or a crisis hotline and offer to assist them in finding resources.

Conclusion: A Collective Journey Toward Healing

World Mental Health Day is far more than a date on a calendar; it is a vibrant and necessary global movement rooted in compassion, solidarity, and the unwavering belief that mental well-being is a universal human right. From its humble beginnings in 1992 to its current status as a major international observance, the day has consistently amplified the voices of those affected by mental illness and pushed the topic from the shadows into the spotlight of global health discourse. The focused theme for 2025 on humanitarian emergencies reminds us that in times of profound crisis, attending to the psychological wounds of survivors is not a luxury but a fundamental and life-saving component of aid. As we mark this day each year, we are collectively reaffirming our commitment to building a world where everyone, everywhere, has the opportunity to achieve mental well-being, access the care they need without stigma or barrier, and recover and rebuild their lives with dignity and hope.

Photo: Freepik

World Day Against the Death Penalty: History, Impact and the Global Fight for Abolition.

World Day Against the Death Penalty: History, Key Themes, Global Impact and the Future of Abolition

The World Day Against the Death Penalty, observed annually on October 10, represents a significant global initiative that unites individuals, organizations, and governments worldwide in advocating for the universal abolition of capital punishment. Established in 2003 by the World Coalition Against the Death Penalty, this international day of awareness and action has grown into a powerful platform for the global abolitionist movement, mobilizing civil society, political leaders, legal professionals, and ordinary citizens to amplify their call for an end to state-sanctioned executions. The creation of this day marked a pivotal moment in the international human rights calendar, providing a focused occasion to highlight the various injustices associated with capital punishment and to coordinate efforts across national boundaries toward its complete eradication. The observation of this day has since gained remarkable traction, with activities and events now taking place in numerous countries across all inhabited continents, making it one of the most widely recognized human rights observances in the world. 

The historical origins of the World Day Against the Death Penalty can be traced to the First World Congress Against the Death Penalty, which was held in Strasbourg in June 2001 and organized by the French non-governmental organization Together Against the Death Penalty (ECPM). During this landmark gathering, participants adopted the Strasbourg Declaration, in which they formally committed to "create a world-wide co-ordination of abolitionist associations and campaigners, whose first goal will be to launch a world-wide day for the universal abolition of the death penalty." This commitment led to the formal establishment of the World Coalition Against the Death Penalty on May 13, 2002, in Rome, with the specific mandate of strengthening the international dimension of the fight against capital punishment. True to the pledge made by its founders, the World Coalition made the establishment of an annual World Day one of its primary objectives, successfully launching the first observance in 2003. The rapid institutional recognition of the day came in 2007 when the Council of Europe officially declared October 10 as the "European Day Against the Death Penalty," creating a complementary European observance that shares the same date and objectives as the World Day.

The Organizing Body: World Coalition Against the Death Penalty

The World Coalition Against the Death Penalty serves as the primary organizational force behind the World Day and represents a sophisticated international network of abolitionist voices. Founded officially in Rome on May 13, 2002, the World Coalition emerged from the commitment made by signatories to the Final Declaration of the first World Congress Against the Death Penalty held in Strasbourg the previous year. The organization began with a modest membership but has expanded significantly over the years, now comprising more than 160 non-governmental organizations, bar associations, local authorities, and trade unions from across the globe. This diverse membership reflects the multifaceted nature of the abolitionist movement, incorporating voices from various sectors of civil society and professional backgrounds, all united by their common opposition to capital punishment. The World Coalition operates as a registered entity in France but maintains a truly global presence through its widespread membership and international advocacy activities, functioning as a coordinating body that amplifies and complements the efforts of its member organizations rather than replacing their independent initiatives.

The organizational structure of the World Coalition Against the Death Penalty is designed to ensure democratic governance and effective coordination of its global activities. The coalition's member organizations convene every two years in a General Assembly where they define the strategic direction for the organization and elect representatives to a Steering Committee that serves a two-year term. This Steering Committee is responsible for implementing the strategy established by the General Assembly and makes necessary operational decisions between assembly meetings. Further refining the governance structure, the Steering Committee elects an Executive Board that includes a President and Treasurer, tasked with the general management, financial oversight, and governance functions related to the Secretariat. The Secretariat, comprised of salaried staff, operates under the supervision of the Steering Committee and is responsible for implementing decisions made by the various governance bodies, managing the budget, and coordinating the World Coalition's daily activities. Financially, the organization relies on contributions from its members, donors, and institutional sponsors, maintaining transparency and accountability through regular reporting to its governance structures. This sophisticated organizational framework enables the World Coalition to effectively pursue its mission of obtaining universal abolition through supporting member organizations, coordinating international advocacy, and working toward reduction in death penalty applications as a step toward complete elimination.

Themes and Focus Areas: Evolving Priorities

The World Day Against the Death Penalty has adopted a thematic approach since 2005, selecting specific aspects of capital punishment to highlight each year, thereby focusing advocacy efforts and public attention on particular dimensions of the issue. This strategic approach allows the global abolitionist movement to delve deeply into specialized topics, raising awareness about how the death penalty intersects with various social, legal, and political issues. The thematic focus has evolved significantly over the years, addressing such critical issues as the living conditions on death row, poverty, terrorism, drug crimes, and mental health. By exploring these specific themes, the World Day has been able to illuminate the multifaceted injustices associated with capital punishment and challenge the various rationales used to justify its continuation. This thematic specialization has proven particularly effective in debunking misconceptions about the death penalty and highlighting its disproportionate impact on vulnerable populations, thereby strengthening the case for abolition through evidence-based arguments and human stories.

Women and the Death Penalty

In 2021, the World Day focused specifically on "Women and the death penalty, an invisible reality," shedding light on the often-overlooked plight of women who face capital punishment worldwide. This theme revealed the extensive discrimination based on sex and gender that female defendants often encounter in death penalty cases, frequently compounded by other elements of identity such as age, sexual orientation, disability, and race. These intersecting forms of structural inequality expose women to unique prejudices that can significantly impact their sentencing outcomes, particularly when they are stereotyped according to harmful archetypes such as "an evil mother, a witch, or a femme fatale." Such gender-based discrimination often leads to critical mitigating factors—such as histories of gender-based violence and abuse—being overlooked during arrest and trial proceedings. The 2021 observance highlighted startling statistics, including the Cornell Center on the Death Penalty Worldwide's estimate that at least 800 women were sentenced to death globally at that time, with at least seven countries confirmed to have women on death row in 2020: Ghana, Japan, Maldives, Taiwan, Thailand, the United States, and Zambia. The actual number was believed to be significantly higher, particularly in countries like Saudi Arabia and Iran where accurate breakdowns of death-row statistics by gender are not publicly available. Tragically, among the 483 individuals known to have been executed in 2020, 16 were women located in Egypt, Iran, Oman, and Saudi Arabia, underscoring the very real consequences of this gender-based discrimination.

The Death Penalty and Public Security

For both 2024 and 2025, the World Day has focused on challenging the misconception that the death penalty can enhance public safety, under the theme "The Death Penalty Protects No One: Abolish it Now." This thematic focus directly confronts the political rhetoric often used to justify capital punishment, particularly in contexts of social unrest or political instability. The campaign emphasizes that security is commonly understood as freedom from danger or threat but notes that its interpretation varies considerably across different political and cultural contexts. The theme specifically addresses how the term "security" is often rooted in political discourse and frequently employed as a tactical tool to influence public opinion and justify severe security policies, including executions. The determination of who is considered a threat and who deserves protection is often influenced by power dynamics, discrimination, and structural inequalities, resulting in security offenses being broadly defined in ways that can be easily abused for political purposes. Using the "security argument" in death penalty advocacy, the campaign argues, politicizes judicial procedures that are supposed to be impartial and fair, and may ultimately provide context for human rights abuses conducted in the name of state protection. The 2024-2025 observance underscores the undeniable reality that the death penalty does not genuinely protect individuals and societies because it fundamentally threatens human dignity and reinforces social and economic disparities by disproportionately affecting marginalized groups. Instead, the campaign promotes effective long-term solutions that prioritize people's actual concerns, tackle the root causes of crime and violence, and apply a human security approach to conflict resolution and creating genuinely safer societies.

Global Participation and Impact

The World Day Against the Death Penalty has generated remarkable global participation since its inception, mobilizing a diverse array of actors across the international community. The observance brings together non-governmental organizations, teachers, lawyers, local representatives, parliamentarians, artists, reporters, religious leaders, and ordinary citizens in a unified demonstration of opposition to capital punishment. This broad participation manifests through an impressive variety of activities including public debates, concerts, press conferences, demonstrations, petitions, and educational and cultural activities tailored to local contexts and opportunities. The growth in participation has been substantial over the years, with even the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 failing to dampen the enthusiasm of abolitionists worldwide—that year witnessed over 500 events planned in more than 70 countries across the globe. This extensive participation demonstrates how the World Day has successfully created a coordinated platform for expression and advocacy that transcends national boundaries, political systems, and cultural traditions, uniting diverse voices under the common objective of universal abolition.

The World Day has garnered significant institutional support from major international organizations and governmental bodies, strengthening its legitimacy and amplifying its message through official channels. The European Union and the Council of Europe have been particularly vocal in their endorsement, regularly issuing joint statements reaffirming their "unequivocal opposition to the death penalty, in all cases and in all circumstances." Similarly, the United Nations has consistently supported the observance through various mechanisms and declarations. This high-level institutional backing complements the grassroots activism that characterizes the day, creating a comprehensive advocacy framework that operates at multiple levels of governance and society. The impact of this coordinated activism is reflected in the growing trend toward abolition worldwide, with a record number of 130 countries voting in favor of the United Nations General Assembly Resolution on a moratorium on the use of the death penalty in 2024. Additionally, the World Day has inspired complementary initiatives such as the "Cities Against the Death Penalty" annual operation launched by the Community of Sant'Egidio, further expanding the reach and diversity of abolitionist activities. The convergence of grassroots mobilization and institutional support makes the World Day an exceptionally powerful tool for advancing the cause of abolition worldwide.

Current Global Landscape of the Death Penalty

Statistical Overview and Abolition Trends

The global landscape of the death penalty has undergone significant transformation over recent decades, reflecting a consistent trend toward abolition across most of the world. According to recent statistics from Amnesty International cited in the search results, 113 countries have abolished the death penalty for all crimes as of 2024, while an additional 9 states have abolished capital punishment for ordinary crimes, maintaining it only under exceptional circumstances such as wartime offenses. Beyond these, another 23 countries are considered abolitionist in practice, meaning they retain the death penalty in law but have not carried out executions for at least a decade and are believed to have a policy or established practice of not conducting executions. This means that a total of 145 countries—approximately 77% of the world's states—have turned away from the application of the death penalty in practice. Conversely, 54 countries remain retentionist, continuing to impose and/or carry out capital punishment. This distribution demonstrates that the abolitionist position has become the dominant norm within the international community, with retentionist states increasingly finding themselves in the minority and facing growing diplomatic pressure to align with global human rights standards. The progress toward abolition has continued in recent years, with 2024 witnessing the abolition of the death penalty by Zimbabwe, along with the ratification of the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights by Zambia and Côte d'Ivoire, significant developments that further consolidated the global trend against capital punishment.

Troubling Trends in Application

Despite the encouraging trend toward legal abolition, recent years have witnessed some deeply concerning developments in the application of the death penalty in those countries that retain it. According to disturbing statistics, there has been a sharp rise in executions globally, with at least 1,518 people executed in 2024 across just 15 countries—marking the second consecutive year in which executions reached their highest level since 2015 according to Amnesty International's data. This alarming trend has continued into 2025, with particularly dramatic increases in specific countries; for instance, more than 1,000 executions were already recorded in Iran alone during 2025—the highest figure reported in over three decades according to the NGO Iran Human Rights. The geographical concentration of executions remains pronounced, with the five countries that carried out the most executions in 2024 being China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and Yemen. China continues to maintain its position as the world's leading executioner, though exact numbers remain difficult to determine due to state secrecy surrounding death penalty statistics. Beyond the increasing numbers, another troubling trend is the continued application of the death penalty for crimes that do not meet the "most serious crimes" threshold under international law, which is defined as crimes of extreme gravity involving intentional killing. In 2024, a shocking 43% of recorded executions worldwide were for drug-related offenses, which clearly do not meet this international standard, representing a serious violation of human rights protections. Additionally, at least 28,085 individuals are known to be under a sentence of death around the world at the end of 2024, with approximately 5% of these being women according to statistics from the Cornell Center on the Death Penalty Worldwide. These statistics collectively paint a picture of a world deeply divided on the issue of capital punishment, with a growing majority of nations rejecting it entirely while a small number of retentionist states actually increase their use of executions.

Political Context and Controversies

Key Arguments in the Death Penalty Debate

The ongoing global debate surrounding the death penalty involves several persistent arguments that the World Day Against the Death Penalty seeks to address through evidence-based advocacy and public education. Deterrence has long served as a primary justification advanced by retentionist governments, who claim that capital punishment prevents serious crimes more effectively than alternative sanctions. However, this argument has been consistently undermined by empirical research, as noted in the joint statement from the European Union and Council of Europe: "Studies consistently show that states with capital punishment do not have lower crime rates than those without." This body of research demonstrates that the certainty of detection and apprehension, rather than the severity of punishment, serves as the primary deterrent to criminal behavior. Another significant concern highlighted by abolitionists is the irreversibility of capital punishment in cases of judicial error, with the search results noting that "No legal system is safe from judicial errors, which may lead to the loss of innocent lives." This fundamental flaw in the application of the death penalty has gained increasing attention as numerous cases of wrongful convictions have emerged in various jurisdictions, sometimes discovered only after executions had already been carried out. Additionally, abolitionist arguments emphasize how the death penalty "makes miscarriages of justice irreversible and any reformation and social rehabilitation impossible," representing an ultimate denial of human dignity and violating the fundamental right to life. The search results also highlight the economic and social disparities that characterize the application of capital punishment, noting that it "disproportionately targets marginalized and vulnerable communities" and "reinforces social and economic disparities by disproportionately affecting marginalized groups." These discriminatory patterns have been documented across various retentionist jurisdictions, where factors such as poverty, race, ethnicity, and mental disability often significantly influence who receives death sentences rather than the mere facts of the crimes committed.

Political Challenges and Setbacks

The abolitionist movement currently faces significant political challenges, including concerning efforts in several countries to potentially reintroduce capital punishment or expand its application. Recent developments highlighted in the search results reveal that "in several countries, some political leaders are reviving rhetoric that equates security with punishment, calling for reinforcement or even the reintroduction of capital punishment." These developments represent potential setbacks for the global abolitionist movement and demonstrate how the death penalty remains a politically contentious issue in various regions. Specifically, the search results point to several troubling developments that have raised concerns among human rights advocates: In the United States, a Presidential proclamation has sought to reintroduce the death penalty in Washington D.C. to "deter and punish the most heinous crimes," representing a significant policy shift at the federal level. In Kyrgyzstan, the President has instructed the drafting of a bill to reinstate the death penalty for severe crimes against children and women, despite the country's abolition in 2007 and its commitment under the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to abolish the death penalty permanently. In Chad, a new commission has been established to consider restoring the death penalty, merely four years after the country had abolished capital punishment, potentially reversing what had been celebrated as significant progress. In Israel, a bill allowing the death penalty for "terrorist" crimes has passed its first reading, marking a potential expansion of capital punishment in that jurisdiction. These developments illustrate how the death penalty continues to be weaponized in political discourse, with proponents invoking "security" as justification for executions. As noted in the search results, "Invoking 'security' to justify executions is common political rhetoric" that often overlooks more effective approaches to public safety. Despite these challenges, the search results also note encouraging examples of countries maintaining abolitionist stances "even in the most difficult contexts of insecurity and conflict," demonstrating that "strong political will can pave the way for positive change" regardless of security circumstances.

Future Directions and Conclusion

The World Day Against the Death Penalty has evolved significantly since its establishment in 2003, growing from a symbolic observance into a powerful global movement that coordinates diverse actors toward the common goal of universal abolition. This annual event has successfully unified grassroots activists, civil society organizations, international institutions, and political leaders behind a shared agenda, creating a coordinated platform for advocacy, education, and mobilization that transcends national boundaries. Through its strategic thematic focus on specific aspects of the death penalty—from its impact on women and its relationship to public security to the conditions on death row and its application for drug offenses—the World Day has deepened public understanding of capital punishment's complex dimensions and systematically challenged the rationales used to justify its continuation. The observable progress toward abolition is undeniable, with more than two-thirds of all countries having now abolished the death penalty in law or in practice, and a record number of states supporting the UN General Assembly's moratorium resolution. Yet despite this encouraging trend, the path to universal abolition remains fraught with challenges, as evidenced by the rising execution numbers in several retentionist countries and the persistent political initiatives to reintroduce or expand capital punishment in some jurisdictions.

Looking toward the future, the abolitionist movement continues to develop new strategies and initiatives to advance its cause, particularly focusing on engaging younger generations and strengthening international cooperation. The Council of Europe has launched innovative workshops entitled "Death is not Justice – youth advocacy and awareness-raising for the abolition of the death penalty," with the explicit aim of establishing "a network of young ambassadors to fight for abolition across Europe and the world." This intergenerational approach recognizes the importance of cultivating new leadership within the movement to carry the struggle forward in coming decades. Similarly, the development of educational resources such as a "training course on youth advocacy" and "a new HELP module on the abolition of the death penalty" represents strategic investment in building the knowledge and capacity of future abolitionists. The upcoming regional Congress against the Death Penalty in Japan in November 2025 and the World Congress against the Death Penalty in France in 2026 will provide crucial opportunities for the global movement to reassess strategies, share best practices, and strengthen international solidarity. These gatherings, alongside the continued growth of the World Day Against the Death Penalty, demonstrate the dynamism and resilience of the abolitionist movement despite the significant challenges it faces. As the search results affirm, "The death penalty, including the process leading to its execution, represent an inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, and the ultimate denial of human dignity"—a fundamental moral principle that continues to inspire and unite those working toward a world free from capital punishment. 

Photo from: iStock