1946: Parliament of Canada Defines Canadian Citizenship Through the Canadian Citizenship Act

The Canadian Citizenship Act of 1946: A Definitive History of Canada's National Identity

The passage of the Canadian Citizenship Act in 1946 marked a watershed moment in Canada's evolution as an independent nation. This landmark legislation, which came into force on January 1, 1947, created for the first time a distinct legal status of Canadian citizenship separate from British subjecthood. The Act represented both a symbolic and practical assertion of Canadian sovereignty following the nation's significant contributions to World War II, reflecting a growing sense of national identity that had been developing since Confederation. 

This comprehensive history will explore the colonial origins of nationality in Canada, the immediate post-war context that made the 1946 Act necessary, the detailed provisions of the legislation itself, its social and political impacts, and its lasting legacy in shaping modern Canadian identity.

Colonial Foundations and Pre-1947 Citizenship Concepts

To fully appreciate the significance of the 1946 Citizenship Act, we must first understand the complex legal landscape of nationality that preceded it. Canada's early history as both a French and British colony created layered systems of allegiance and subjecthood that would influence later citizenship concepts. When Canada became a French possession in 1663, Louis XIV established that the laws and ordinances of France governed the territory, including feudal systems of allegiance tied to land ownership . The French system defined subjects primarily by birthplace (jus soli) but excluded married women from independent legal status under the doctrine of coverture .

The British conquest in 1763 brought English Common Law definitions of subjecthood, which recognized all persons born within British territories as subjects of the Crown . Unlike the French system, British law did not automatically extend statutes on nationality beyond the United Kingdom itself, leading to jurisdictional conflicts across the empire. The Quebec Act of 1774 restored French civil law in Quebec while maintaining British criminal law, creating an early legal duality that would characterize Canadian jurisprudence . This bifurcated system continued after the Constitutional Act of 1791 divided Canada into Upper and Lower Canada with their respective legal traditions .

Following Confederation in 1867, the new Dominion of Canada gained authority over "Naturalization and Aliens" under section 91(25) of the British North America Act. The first federal legislation, the Aliens and Naturalization Act of 1868, allowed aliens to apply for naturalization after three years' residence and maintained that alien-born women automatically derived their status from their husbands. This principle of dependent nationality for married women would persist in Canadian law for decades. The 1868 Act was replaced by the Naturalization and Aliens Act of 1881, which standardized naturalization requirements across the Dominion and explicitly affirmed that Canadian women lost their independent nationality upon marriage to a foreigner .

The early 20th century saw Canada develop more distinct concepts of nationality within the broader framework of British subjecthood. The Immigration Act of 1910 first introduced the term "Canadian citizen" to designate British subjects born, naturalized, or domiciled in Canada—though this was primarily an immigration control mechanism rather than a true nationality status . "Domicile" was defined as three years' residence (excluding time in institutions), and this status allowed free entry to Canada while other British subjects required permission to land . The Canadian Nationals Act of 1921 created a separate category of "Canadian national" that included Canadian citizens as defined in 1910, their wives, and children fathered by such citizens who had not yet landed in Canada . However, these remained subcategories of British subject status, which was still governed by the imperial British Nationality and Status of Aliens Act 1914 as adopted in Canada through the Naturalization Act of 1914.

This patchwork system created numerous anomalies and inequities. Women's nationality rights were particularly restricted—under the 1914 Act, a Canadian woman marrying a foreign man automatically lost her British subject status, while a foreign woman marrying a Canadian man gained it . There were also racial dimensions to early nationality policies, exemplified by the Chinese Immigration Act of 1885 (which imposed a head tax) and the 1908 Continuous Journey Regulation that effectively barred Indian immigration . For Indigenous peoples, the Indian Act of 1876 created a separate legal status where First Nations women lost their Indian status if they married non-status men—a discriminatory provision that would remain until 1985 .

The Road to 1946: Wartime Nationalism and Legislative Development

The transformative impact of World War II served as the crucial catalyst for Canada to establish its own citizenship law. Canada's independent declaration of war in 1939 (a week after Britain's) and its significant military contributions fostered a new sense of national identity separate from the British Empire. Over one million Canadians served in the armed forces during the war, with casualties exceeding 45,000 . This sacrifice, combined with Canada's emerging role in international affairs (including participation in the 1945 founding of the United Nations), created strong public sentiment for formal recognition of Canadian nationhood.

Paul Martin Sr., the Secretary of State for Canada in Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie King's government, became the driving force behind the citizenship legislation. As the son of an Irish father and French-Canadian mother, Martin was particularly attuned to issues of national unity and identity . He introduced the Canadian Citizenship bill in the House of Commons on March 20, 1946, arguing it would foster shared national purpose among Canada's increasingly diverse population . The bill represented a compromise—while Martin had initially proposed replacing British subject status entirely with Canadian citizenship, the cabinet maintained that Canadian citizens would also remain British subjects .

The parliamentary debates revealed both nationalist enthusiasm and imperial nostalgia. Progressive Conservative MP John Diefenbaker opposed the bill, warning it would create "dissension and an undesirable split in the British Commonwealth" . However, such objections were overcome by the prevailing postwar mood, and the bill passed on June 27, 1946, with an effective date of January 1, 1947. The legislation repealed earlier acts including the Immigration Act of 1910, Naturalization Act of 1914, and Canadian Nationals Act of 1921, consolidating citizenship law into a single statute.

Provisions and Implementation of the 1946 Act

The Canadian Citizenship Act of 1946 created a comprehensive framework for the acquisition, loss, and meaning of Canadian citizenship. Its provisions reflected both progressive elements and lingering restrictions characteristic of the era.

Immediate Conferred Citizenship (as of January 1, 1947):

The Act automatically granted citizenship to several categories of persons:

• Those born in Canada (or on Canadian ships) before 1947 who had not become aliens 

• Persons granted certificates of naturalization under previous Canadian laws 

• British subjects who had acquired Canadian domicile (five years' residence as landed immigrants) before 1947 

• British subjects resident in Canada for 20 years immediately before 1947 (not under deportation orders) 

• Women married to Canadians before 1947 who entered as landed immigrants 

• Children born outside Canada to Canadian fathers (or mothers if born out of wedlock) before 1947 

The gendered language and paternal focus reflected prevailing norms—a child's citizenship generally derived from the father except in cases of illegitimacy . The Act also contained provisions for those who might have otherwise fallen through the cracks. In 1956, Parliament amended the Act to retroactively grant citizenship to certain First Nations and Inuit who had entered from Alaska before 1947 without formal application, provided they were domiciled in Canada by 1947 and had 10 years' residence by 1956 .

Acquisition of Citizenship After 1947:

For those not covered by the initial conferral, the Act established pathways to citizenship:

• Birth in Canada (excluding children of foreign diplomats unless one parent was a citizen/permanent resident) 

• Naturalization after five years' residence as a landed immigrant 

• Grant of citizenship to foreign women married to Canadian men after one year's residence 

• Restoration of citizenship to women who lost British subject status pre-1947 through marriage to foreigners 

• Registration of children born abroad to Canadian parents (fathers for legitimate children, mothers for illegitimate) 

The naturalization requirements included being at least 21 years old, having five years' residency (reduced to one year for WWII veterans), demonstrating good character, and possessing adequate knowledge of English or French (waived for those with 20+ years residence) . These provisions represented a liberalization from earlier language requirements and recognized the contributions of long-term residents .

Special Cases: Newfoundland and Labrador:

When Newfoundland joined Confederation on April 1, 1949, its residents became Canadian citizens under terms similar to the 1947 implementation . Section 44A of the amended Act granted citizenship to Newfoundlanders who were British subjects on the date of union, with special provisions for those born outside Newfoundland to Newfoundlander parents .

Loss of Citizenship:

The Act outlined several scenarios where citizenship could be lost:

• Naturalization in another country 

• Naturalization of a parent (for minors) 

• Service in foreign armed forces 

• Naturalized citizens living abroad for 10+ years without filing retention declarations 

• Citizens by descent failing to file retention declarations between ages 21-22 

While the Act restricted dual citizenship in principle, loopholes existed—naturalizing Canadians weren't required to prove relinquishment of previous nationalities, and children born in Canada to foreign parents could retain foreign citizenship . The governor-in-council also held discretionary power to revoke citizenship from naturalized persons for disloyalty, wartime enemy engagement, prolonged foreign residence, or fraudulent naturalization .

Implementation and Early Impact

The ceremonial launch of the new citizenship regime was carefully orchestrated to emphasize national unity and diversity. The first citizenship certificate (number 0001) was symbolically awarded to Prime Minister Mackenzie King on January 3, 1947, followed by Wasyl Eleniak, a Ukrainian farmer who had immigrated in 1893 . This pairing of political leader and immigrant set the tone for National Citizenship Week celebrations across the country.

In Toronto on January 13, 1947, future Prime Minister Louis St. Laurent delivered the influential "Gray Lecture," articulating the government's vision for citizenship as a unifying force that would allow Canadians to "better participate in world affairs, leaving partisan affiliations aside to present a united front" . Citizenship ceremonies deliberately highlighted Canada's ethnic diversity, with Winnipeg's event presenting certificates to three groups: non-British immigrants encouraged to retain cultural traditions, naturalized Canadians/British subjects, and Canadian-born individuals .

The Act's progressive elements were immediately apparent in gender equity provisions. Married women finally gained control over their nationality—they no longer automatically lost citizenship by marrying foreigners nor lost status if their husbands ceased to be citizens (unless citizenship had been obtained through marriage) . This reform aligned with postwar societal shifts recognizing women's autonomy.

However, racial barriers persisted despite the Act's inclusive rhetoric. Although the Chinese Immigration Act was repealed in 1947, other discriminatory policies remained until the 1960s . The Act's language requirements, while more flexible than before, still favored European immigrants over others . Full gender equality in citizenship transmission (equal recognition of mothers and fathers) wouldn't come until the 1977 Citizenship Act .

International Influence and Comparative Context

Canada's 1946 legislation had ripple effects across the Commonwealth. As the first dominion to create its own citizenship separate from British subjecthood, Canada's example prompted other Commonwealth nations to reevaluate their nationality laws . Most significantly, it influenced the United Kingdom's British Nationality Act of 1948, which established citizenship of the UK and Colonies while maintaining the broader category of British subject (later Commonwealth citizen) .

Compared to contemporaneous nationality laws, Canada's Act was relatively progressive. The U.S. still maintained racial restrictions on naturalization until 1952, while Australia retained its "White Australia" policy until the 1960s . Canada's inclusion of jus soli (birthright citizenship) and provisions for citizenship by descent placed it closer to the liberal democratic model than to ethnocentric nationality concepts emerging in postwar Europe.

The Act's approach to dual nationality reflected mid-20th century ambivalence—while officially discouraged, it was tolerated in practice more than in many European countries that demanded exclusive allegiance . This pragmatic approach foreshadowed Canada's full acceptance of multiple citizenship in 1977.

Evolution and Replacement: The Path to the 1977 Citizenship Act

Over its thirty-year lifespan, the 1946 Act underwent several amendments addressing gaps and inequities. The 1956 amendment for Indigenous peoples from Alaska was one such adjustment . However, by the 1970s, the Act showed its age—its gender distinctions, British subject remnants, and dual nationality restrictions seemed increasingly anachronistic in multicultural, post-imperial Canada.

The new Citizenship Act of 1976 (effective February 15, 1977) brought sweeping changes:

• Full gender equality in citizenship transmission 

• Acceptance of dual citizenship 

• Reduced residency requirement from five to three years 

• Elimination of special treatment for British subjects 

• Conceptual shift from citizenship as privilege to citizenship as right 

This reform addressed many of the 1946 Act's limitations while preserving its core framework of birthright citizenship and naturalization pathways. The 1977 Act remains the foundation of Canadian citizenship law today, albeit with subsequent amendments like the 2014 Strengthening Canadian Citizenship Act (later partially repealed) and recent proposals to extend citizenship by descent .

Legacy and Historical Significance

The Canadian Citizenship Act of 1946 represents one of the most important milestones in Canada's development as an independent nation. Its creation of a distinct Canadian citizenship, separate from British subjecthood, gave legal form to the national identity that had been evolving since Confederation and was crystallized by World War II. As historian Valerie Knowles notes, the Act was "a significant expression of Canada's emerging sense of national identity" following its wartime contributions .

Politically, the Act advanced Canada's autonomy within the Commonwealth while maintaining ties to Britain—a delicate balance characteristic of Mackenzie King's leadership. Socially, it fostered national unity by providing a common legal status transcending ethnic and regional divisions, even if full equality would take decades longer to achieve. The Act's inclusive potential was gradually realized through subsequent reforms, laying groundwork for Canada's modern multicultural identity.

The 1946 Act's limitations—particularly its gender asymmetries and residual British imperial mindset—reflected its historical context. Yet its core principles of birthright citizenship, reasonable naturalization requirements, and inclusive civic nationalism established a framework that would enable Canada's transformation into one of the world's most diverse and democratic societies. As Canada continues to debate citizenship issues in the 21st century—from revocation provisions to diaspora rights—the legacy of the 1946 Act remains foundational to understanding what it means to be Canadian.

Photo from: iStock

Share this

myearthisone