The 2005 UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions
The Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions, adopted by UNESCO on October 20, 2005, stands as a landmark international legal framework that affirms the sovereign right of states to implement policies that protect and promote cultural diversity. Born from concerns over cultural homogenization in an era of globalization and trade liberalization, this legally binding instrument recognizes that cultural activities, goods, and services possess unique identity-bearing value beyond mere commercial commodities. The convention, which entered into force in March 2007, establishes a global system of governance for culture, aiming to create conditions for cultures to flourish and interact freely while promoting sustainable development and international cooperation .
Historical Context and Genesis of the Convention
The path to the 2005 Convention was paved by decades of growing concern among the international community regarding the vulnerability of national cultures and cultural policies in the face of accelerating globalization. The concept emerged from a significant paradigm shift in international relations, moving beyond the earlier notions of "cultural exception" or "cultural exemption" that had appeared during the 1980s . This shift was largely a response to the framework of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and other international agreements promoting trade liberalization, which were perceived as undermining the sovereign right of states to use cultural policies to support their own cultural industries . The fear was that without such protections, global cultural expressions would become increasingly uniform, dominated by major production centers like Hollywood, thereby marginalizing local and national cultures, particularly those in developing countries .
A pivotal moment in this journey was the adoption of the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity on November 2, 2001. Unanimously approved by 188 member states in the poignant aftermath of the September 11 attacks, the declaration served as a powerful political statement, affirming that "respect for the diversity of cultures, tolerance, dialogue and cooperation, in a climate of mutual trust and understanding, are among the best guarantees of international peace and security" . Its Article 8 crucially stated that "cultural goods and services... because they convey identity, values and meaning, should not be treated as commodities or consumer goods like any other." However, as a declaration, it was not legally binding. It was in the Annex to this declaration that UNESCO member states were first invited to consider the desirability of negotiating a binding international legal instrument on cultural diversity .
The technical and political process towards a convention began in earnest in 2002 at the initiative of eight member states. The UNESCO Executive Board commissioned a preliminary study, and by 2003, the General Conference invited the Director-General to prepare a draft convention . The drafting process was both meticulous and inclusive. The Director-General established a group of 15 independent experts who, through three meetings between December 2003 and May 2004, produced a preliminary draft text covering all core chapters of the future convention . This draft was then opened for intergovernmental negotiation. The first session of the Intergovernmental Meeting of Experts in September 2004 was attended by nearly 550 experts from 132 Member States, alongside numerous intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations, indicating the high level of global interest in the topic . A 24-member Drafting Committee was established, and through two further sessions of intense negotiation, a final draft was prepared for the consideration of the General Conference .
Objectives and Guiding Principles of the Convention
The Convention was crafted with a set of clear and interconnected objectives that collectively aim to rebalance the global discourse on culture and trade. Its primary goal is to protect and promote the diversity of cultural expressions worldwide . It seeks to create the conditions for cultures to flourish and to interact freely in a mutually beneficial manner, thereby fostering intercultural dialogue, respect, and a culture of peace . A fundamental objective is to reaffirm the sovereign right of states to formulate and implement their own cultural policies . The convention also aims to recognize the distinctive nature of cultural activities, goods, and services as vehicles of identity, values, and meaning, which distinguishes them from ordinary commodities . Furthermore, it seeks to strengthen international cooperation and solidarity, with a special focus on enhancing the capacities of developing countries to protect and promote their own cultural sectors .
Underpinning these objectives is a robust set of guiding principles that serve as the moral and operational compass for the implementation of the convention. A foundational principle is that the protection and promotion of cultural diversity can only be achieved when human rights and fundamental freedoms, such as freedom of expression, information, and communication, as well as the ability of individuals to choose their cultural expressions, are fully guaranteed . The principle of sovereignty is central, explicitly stating that nations have the sovereign right to adopt measures and policies to protect and promote the diversity of cultural expressions within their territory . The convention also establishes the principle of equal dignity, affirming that the protection and promotion of diversity presuppose the recognition of equal dignity of and respect for all cultures, including the cultures of persons belonging to minorities and indigenous peoples . Other key principles include the importance of international cooperation and solidarity, the recognition that culture is as important for development as economic factors, the understanding that cultural diversity is a rich asset for humanity and a prerequisite for sustainable development, and the principle of openness, which ensures that measures to support domestic culture do not lead to isolationism but rather promote openness to other cultures of the world .
Key Definitions and Operational Framework
To ensure clarity and common understanding, the Convention provides precise definitions for several core concepts. Cultural diversity is defined as "the many ways that the cultures of groups and societies are expressed," encompassing the ways in which artistic creation and its enjoyment are passed on within and among groups and societies . Cultural expressions are those that "result from the creativity of individuals, groups and societies, and that have cultural content," which in turn refers to the "symbolic meaning, artistic dimension and cultural values that originate from or express cultural identities" . A critical definition is that of cultural activities, goods and services, which are defined as those which "embody or convey cultural expressions, irrespective of the commercial value they may have" . This explicitly acknowledges that such items have a value that transcends their market price. Finally, cultural industries are simply defined as those "producing and distributing cultural goods or services" .
The operational framework of the convention outlines the rights and obligations of the states that are party to it. It encourages measures to promote cultural expressions, with particular attention to the needs of women and various social groups, including minorities and indigenous peoples . It also allows for measures to protect cultural expressions in situations where they are at risk of extinction, under serious threat, or otherwise in need of urgent safeguarding . To ensure transparency and facilitate the exchange of ideas, parties are obliged to share information by submitting reports to UNESCO every four years and designating a national point of contact . The convention also emphasizes the role of education and public awareness, calling for the establishment of educational, training, and exchange programmes, and it explicitly recognizes the important role of civil society in protecting and promoting the diversity of cultural expressions .
A major component of the convention's operational framework is its focus on international cooperation and development. It seeks to promote international cooperation to create conditions conducive to diversity, integrate culture into sustainable development policies at all levels, and support cooperation for sustainable development and poverty reduction, especially in developing countries . A key mechanism for this is the promotion of preferential treatment for developing countries and the creation of the International Fund for Cultural Diversity, which is designed to provide financial support for projects and programs that foster a dynamic cultural sector in the developing world .
Negotiation Challenges and the Relationship with Other International Agreements
One of the most significant and contentious challenges during the negotiations of the convention was defining its relationship with other existing international agreements, particularly those of the World Trade Organization (WTO). The central question was whether the new cultural convention would prevail over, be subordinate to, or exist alongside other treaties . A majority of states, led by France and Canada, argued for a strong text that would place the convention on an equal footing with trade agreements, asserting that the dual nature of cultural goods and services meant they should be governed by both UNESCO and WTO frameworks . This group wanted an explicit clause that would ensure the convention was not subordinated to other commitments.
On the other hand, the United States, along with Japan, New Zealand, Tunisia, and India, questioned the need for such a clause and expressed concerns that the convention could be used as a tool for protectionism, undermining the principles of free trade . The United States, which was not a member of UNESCO when negotiations began (it rejoined in 2003), was a vocal opponent, fearing the treaty would restrict the global flow of media and cultural products . The final compromise is embodied in Article 20, titled "Relationship to other instruments." This article confirms complementarity and non-hierarchy between the convention and other international legal instruments . It states that parties must "foster mutual supportiveness" between this convention and other treaties to which they are party and, when interpreting and applying other treaties or entering into other international obligations, shall take into account the relevant provisions of the 2005 Convention . This delicate wording was essential to securing broad support, reassuring states that it would not override their WTO obligations while affirming its importance in shaping future cultural policy.
Governing Structure and Global Impact
The convention established a dedicated governance structure to oversee its implementation and development. The supreme body is the Conference of Parties, which is composed of all states that have ratified the convention. It meets in ordinary session every two years to deliberate on the convention's operation and effectiveness . Day-to-day governance is handled by the Intergovernmental Committee for the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions. This body, composed of representatives from states parties elected for four-year terms, meets annually and is responsible for promoting the convention's objectives and overseeing its implementation . Administrative support for both bodies is provided by the UNESCO Secretariat .
The global impact of the convention was immediate and profound. When it was put to a vote at the UNESCO General Conference in October 2005, it was approved by an overwhelming majority of 148 countries. Only two states—the United States and Israel—voted against it, with five countries abstaining . This lopsided result highlighted a clear global divide on the issue of culture and trade. The convention entered into force with remarkable speed in March 2007, just 18 months after its adoption, after receiving the required 30 ratifications. As of the latest data, 153 states and the European Union have ratified the convention, making it one of the most widely endorsed treaties in the UN system, though the United States remains notably absent from its list of parties .
The convention's impact operates on multiple levels. Internationally, it provides a legally binding framework for cooperation between states and has legitimized the argument for treating cultural goods and services differently in trade negotiations. Nationally, it has guided governments in legislating and taking action to preserve cultural diversity within their borders, empowering them to support their cultural industries through subsidies, content quotas, and other policy tools without fear of automatically violating trade rules . Locally, it has spurred action by public and civil bodies to support diverse cultural expressions. However, the convention has no enforcing body; it ultimately relies on the goodwill and commitment of its member states, with dispute resolution procedures left to the parties involved .
Conclusion
The 2005 UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions represents a monumental achievement in international cultural policy. It is the first international treaty to explicitly grant cultural goods and services a special status, recognizing them as vehicles of identity, values, and meaning, and not merely as economic commodities . By reconciling the imperative of cultural diversity with the realities of a globalized world, the convention has provided countries, especially developing ones, with a vital tool to defend their cultural sovereignty. It stands as a powerful affirmation that cultural diversity is a common heritage of humanity, essential to human dignity and sustainable development, and that its protection requires conscious, collective, and legally-backed international effort. While challenges in implementation and ongoing tensions with trade regimes persist, the convention has undoubtedly established a new global norm, affirming the fundamental right of communities and nations to sustain and develop their unique cultural voices in the chorus of humanity.
0 Comment to "The 2005 UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions: Historical and Operational Analysis"
Post a Comment