The Making of a Modern Capital: History of Ankara's Designation as Turkey's Capital in 1923
The 13th of October, 1923, marks one of the most transformative decisions in the history of modern Turkey—the official designation of Ankara as the nation's capital. This was not merely an administrative change of address but a profoundly symbolic act that severed the political ties with the Ottoman imperial past and established the heart of a new, secular republic. The decision, championed by the republic's founding father, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, represented a clear vision for Turkey's future—one that was rooted in Anatolia, embraced modernity, and asserted national sovereignty. The choice to replace Istanbul, a city that had served as the imperial capital for nearly 470 years under the Ottomans and Byzantines, was both pragmatic and revolutionary. It shifted the country's political center of gravity away from the cosmopolitan, coastal Istanbul to the rugged, central Anatolian plateau, signaling the birth of a nation-state that would be built from the inside out. This paper will explore the complete details of this pivotal event, delving into the historical context of the Ottoman Empire's collapse, the strategic imperatives of the Turkish War of Independence, the political machinations leading to the declaration, and the enduring significance of this decision in shaping the identity and trajectory of the Republic of Turkey.
The Historical Context: The Fall of an Empire and the Prelude to Revolution
To fully comprehend the significance of Ankara's designation, one must first understand the tumultuous period from which the Republic of Turkey emerged. The Ottoman Empire, once a sprawling multi-ethnic empire spanning three continents, found itself on the losing side of World War I. The empire's defeat was catastrophic, leading to the signing of the Armistice of Mudros on 30 October 1918, which effectively surrendered the empire to the Allied powers . This was followed by a brutal occupation of Istanbul by British, French, and Italian forces on 13 November 1918, which seized critical public buildings, controlled the straits, and severely restricted the functioning of the Ottoman government. The once-glorious capital, the seat of the Caliphate, was now under foreign control, its sovereignty extinguished.
The plight of the Ottoman government, often referred to by Turkish nationalists as the "Istanbul Government," became increasingly dire. This administration, under Sultan Mehmed VI, was seen by many as collaborationist, acquiescing to Allied demands and unable to protect national interests. The political and cultural heart of the empire was being systematically dismantled; the press was suppressed, cultural institutions were violated, and the government's authority was neutered . This atmosphere of humiliation and powerlessness created a fertile ground for resistance. Meanwhile, the Allies began to implement their long-laid plans for the partition of the Ottoman heartland, Anatolia. The Treaty of Sèvres, signed in August 1920 by the Ottoman government but never ratified, proposed to carve up Anatolia, creating zones of influence for France, Italy, and Greece, and promising an independent Armenia and a Kurdish state . For the Turkish people, Sèvres was not a peace treaty but a death warrant for their nation.
It was in this vacuum of power and national despair that a Turkish nationalist movement began to coalesce. The movement found its military and political leader in Mustafa Kemal Pasha, a distinguished general who had gained fame during the Gallipoli campaign. Dispatched to Samsun as an inspector of the Ninth Army on 19 May 1919, Mustafa Kemal used this opportunity not to disband remaining Ottoman units as instructed, but to organize the nascent resistance . His arrival in Samsun is commemorated as the beginning of the Turkish War of Independence. From there, he moved to rally support across Anatolia, issuing the Amasya Circular on 12 June 1919, which boldly declared that "the nation's independence will be saved by the nation's determination and decision" . This was a direct challenge to both the occupying powers and the impotent government in Istanbul. The movement gained formal structure through congresses in Erzurum (July 1919) and Sivas (September 1919), where delegates from across Anatolia affirmed the goal of securing national borders and rejecting foreign occupation, establishing a "Representative Committee" with Mustafa Kemal at its head . The stage was set for a monumental struggle, and a new center of power was needed—one far from the reach and influence of occupied Istanbul.
The Strategic Rise of Ankara in the Turkish National Movement
The choice of Ankara as the nerve center of the Turkish nationalist struggle was not accidental; it was a decision borne of strategic necessity, geographical logic, and political foresight. Prior to 1919, Ankara was a modest provincial town in central Anatolia, with a population of only around 35,000-40,000 people . Known in ancient times as Ancyra, it had a rich history as a capital of the Celtic Galatian kingdom and an important Roman provincial center, but by the early 20th century, it was overshadowed by the coastal metropolises. However, its very obscurity and location became its greatest assets in the context of the national struggle.
Mustafa Kemal's arrival in Ankara on 27 December 1919 marked a decisive turning point . He moved the headquarters of the Representative Committee here, effectively making Ankara the de facto capital of the resistance movement. The city's geographical advantages were paramount. Situated in the heart of the Anatolian plateau, about 200 miles south of the Black Sea, it was inland and defensible. Surrounded by hills and located at a strategic junction of road and rail networks, it was easily accessible from various parts of Anatolia yet safe from naval bombardment—a crucial consideration given Mustafa Kemal's reported concern that a capital should be "too far from the coast to be not destroyed by a ship’s cannon" . This central location made it an ideal command post for a war fought across multiple fronts.
Politically, Ankara represented a clean break from the old order. It was distant from the perceived corruption and subservience of the Ottoman court in Istanbul. Establishing the resistance in Anatolia's heartland allowed Mustafa Kemal to root his movement in the Turkish people—the farmers, soldiers, and merchants of the interior—rather than the cosmopolitan elite of the empire . This alignment with "the nation" was a core tenet of the nationalist ideology. The most significant institutional affirmation of Ankara's status came on 23 April 1920, with the opening of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey (TBMM). This act formally created a new, legitimate government in opposition to the Ottoman administration in Istanbul. Mustafa Kemal was elected the first President of the Assembly, which combined executive and legislative powers and became the embodiment of national sovereignty . From this new parliament in Ankara, the Turkish War of Independence was directed, with the city functioning as the logistical, political, and symbolic center of the entire effort. The victory of the Turkish forces, culminating in the Great Offensive of August 1922 and the liberation of Ä°zmir, cemented the authority of the Ankara government . The subsequent signing of the Treaty of Lausanne on 24 July 1923 formally recognized the independence and sovereignty of the new Turkish state, invalidating the Treaty of Sèvres and paving the way for the official proclamation of the republic . With the international community now treating Ankara as the legitimate seat of government, its formal designation as the capital was the logical and inevitable final step.
The Legal and Political Declaration of October 1923
Following the monumental success of the War of Independence and the diplomatic victory at Lausanne, the Turkish nationalist movement turned its attention to the formal establishment of the republic. The political landscape was being deliberately reshaped. The second election for the Grand National Assembly had been carefully managed to ensure a body more aligned with Mustafa Kemal's revolutionary goals . The stage was now set to dissolve the last vestiges of the Ottoman political system and to formally constitutionize the new reality that had been built in Ankara.
The process of declaring Ankara the capital was swift and deliberate. On 9 October 1923, a legislative proposal signed by fourteen members of the parliament was submitted to the Assembly . This was not a spontaneous act but a carefully orchestrated move that reflected the will of Mustafa Kemal and the ruling cadre. The proposal argued for the necessity of a permanent and secure capital for the new state. Just four days later, on 13 October 1923, the Grand National Assembly passed Law No. 364, which officially declared that "The city of Ankara, which has been the seat of the government since its capture by the Turkish army, shall be the capital of the Turkish state" . The language of the law was significant; it rooted the decision in the recent historical struggle, acknowledging that Ankara had already been serving as the capital in practice since the opening of the Assembly in 1920.
Table: The Chronological Path to Ankara's Designation as Capital
| Date | Event | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| 27 December 1919 | Mustafa Kemal arrives in Ankara | Makes Ankara the operational center of the national resistance |
| . | ||
| 23 April 1920 | Grand National Assembly opens in Ankara | Establishes Ankara as the de facto capital of an alternative government |
| . | ||
| 24 July 1923 | Signing of the Treaty of Lausanne | International recognition of the Turkish state, with Ankara as its seat |
| . | ||
| 9 October 1923 | Parliamentary proposal submitted | Formal legislative process to declare Ankara capital begins |
| . | ||
| 13 October 1923 | Law No. 364 passed | Ankara officially declared the capital of Turkey |
| . | ||
| 29 October 1923 | Republic proclaimed | Mustafa Kemal Atatürk elected first President of the Republic of Turkey. |
The declaration of Ankara as the capital was intrinsically linked to the even more monumental proclamation of the republic. Just sixteen days after the capital was established, on 29 October 1923, the Grand National Assembly unanimously declared Turkey a republic, with Mustafa Kemal Atatürk elected as its first president . This sequence of events was deeply symbolic. The move solidified a tripartite revolutionary agenda: the establishment of a republic (new political system), the election of a president (new leadership), and the designation of a new capital (new political geography). Together, they formed an unbreakable chain representing the birth of a completely new state entity, distinct in every way from the Ottoman Empire. The political symbolism was profound. Choosing Ankara was a definitive rejection of Istanbul and all it represented—theocracy, monarchy, and imperial overreach. It was a declaration that the new state would be a secular nation-state, whose sovereignty derived from the people and whose heart lay in the Anatolian homeland, not in a cosmopolitan imperial city . This act completed the political revolution that the military victory had made possible, setting Turkey on a course of radical modernization and Westernization under Atatürk's leadership.
The Aftermath: Building a Modern Capital and a New National Identity
The official designation of Ankara as the capital was only the beginning of an immense nation-building project. The challenge was to transform a small, provincial Anatolian town into a functional and symbolic capital worthy of a modern republic. This transformation was physical, demographic, and cultural, reflecting the revolutionary zeal of the early republican period.
Urban Transformation and Architectural Vision
The immediate task facing the new government was one of rapid construction and urban planning. Ankara in 1923 lacked the infrastructure to host a national government, foreign embassies, and a rapidly growing population of civil servants, military personnel, and their families. The city was described as a sprawling, austere metropolis that needed to be built almost from scratch to meet its new responsibilities . Atatürk envisioned a modern, functional city with wide boulevards, government complexes, and civic institutions that would embody the principles of the republic: order, progress, and secularism . This vision was a deliberate departure from the labyrinthine streets and ornate mosques of Ottoman Istanbul. The government commissioned international and local architects to design a new city adjacent to the old Ottoman core. A key figure in this effort was the German architect Hermann Jansen, whose plan for Ankara emphasized green spaces, geometric street layouts, and zoning that separated administrative, commercial, and residential areas . The architecture of the new government buildings, such as the first Grand National Assembly building and various ministry headquarters, often featured a simplified, modernist style with occasional Ottoman or Seljuk motifs, creating a unique "Republican" architectural language that blended international modernism with Anatolian traditions.
Demographic and Cultural Shift
The declaration of the capital triggered a massive demographic shift. As the center of government, bureaucracy, and the military, Ankara became a magnet for internal migration. Its population, a mere 35,000 in 1924, exploded to over 4.5 million by 2014, making it Turkey's second-largest city after Istanbul . This influx included not only ethnic Turks from rural Anatolia but also Muslim refugees and immigrants from the Balkans, further enriching the city's cultural fabric while reinforcing its Turkish-Muslim character as envisioned by the state . This rapid growth was a testament to the city's new political importance but also brought challenges, including overcrowding and the development of gecekondu (shanty towns) on the city's periphery. Culturally, Ankara was positioned as the antithesis of Istanbul. While Istanbul remained the bustling, historic center of commerce, culture, and cosmopolitan life, Ankara was to be the orderly, bureaucratic heart of the nation. It became a venue for state-sponsored culture, hosting the Presidential Symphony Orchestra, the Turkish State Theatre, and several national museums, such as the Museum of Anatolian Civilizations, which consciously located the origins of Turkish history in the ancient civilizations of Anatolia . This was a key part of the republican project to construct a new national identity that was both modern and authentically Anatolian.
Political Centralization and International Stature
As the capital, Ankara became the undisputed center of Turkish political life. It housed all key institutions of the state: the Presidency, the Grand National Assembly, all government ministries, and the high courts. Foreign embassies were gradually relocated from Istanbul to Ankara, a slow process that nonetheless confirmed its status as the diplomatic capital . This centralization of political power in Anatolia was a core objective of the Kemalist revolution, designed to prevent the concentration of power in a single, historically burdened city like Istanbul and to promote balanced development across the country . The city's very layout reflected this new political order, with the Çankaya district, home to the Presidential Palace, becoming the new seat of executive power, overlooking the city much as the Topkapi Palace once overlooked Istanbul, but in a decidedly modern and secular context. The establishment of several major universities, including Ankara University (1946) and the Middle East Technical University (1956), further cemented the city's role as a center for education, technology, and the formation of the national elite . Through these concerted efforts, the small town of Ankara was systematically transformed into the political and administrative heart of modern Turkey, a living monument to the republican ideals of its founders.
The Enduring Significance of Ankara as the Capital of Modern Turkey
More than a century after its designation, Ankara's status as the capital of Turkey remains a foundational pillar of the republic, embodying both the enduring legacy of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's revolution and the complex realities of contemporary Turkish politics and society. Its significance extends far beyond its administrative function, touching upon issues of national identity, secularism, and geopolitical orientation.
Ankara stands as the ultimate symbol of the Turkish Republic. It is a city conceived and built by the republic, for the republic. In contrast to Istanbul, whose landscape is dominated by the physical remnants of Byzantine and Ottoman empires—Hagia Sophia, the Topkapi Palace, the Sultan Ahmed Mosque—Ankara's skyline is defined by republican monuments . The most potent of these is Anıtkabir, the colossal mausoleum of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, which was completed in 1953 and sits majestically on a hill overlooking the city . Anıtkabir is not merely a tomb; it is a pilgrimage site and a sacred space for the secular state, housing a museum that narrates the story of the War of Independence and the Atatürkist reforms. It serves as a constant physical reminder of the founding principles of the republic and the man who orchestrated its creation. Other key sites, like the War of Independence Museum located in the first parliament building, further anchor the national narrative in the city of Ankara, forever linking the city's identity to the struggle for sovereignty and the establishment of the state .
The choice of Ankara also cemented Turkey's geopolitical orientation as a nation rooted in Anatolia. By turning its back on the imperial, trans-continental ambitions associated with Istanbul, the republic signaled its intention to consolidate a nation-state within its Anatolian heartland. This internal focus, often described as the "Anatolian thesis," posited that the true strength and character of the Turkish nation derived from its deep roots in the Anatolian soil and its people . This stood in stark contrast to the Ottoman Empire's orientation toward the Balkans and the Arab world. Ankara's central location made it a practical hub for governing this heartland and for developing transportation networks—roads and railways—that would bind the nation together, a role it continues to play today as a vital national transportation hub .
Economically, the designation of the capital spurred the development of the interior. While Istanbul has retained its primacy as the country's commercial and financial center, Ankara grew into a significant economic engine in its own right. It became a city of government, education, and industry, home to a diverse economy that includes flour and sugar production, cement, construction materials, and tractor manufacturing . The legacy of the surrounding region, famous for its Angora goats (producing mohair) and Angora rabbits, continued, with Ankara remaining a center for the wool trade . The city is also a top science and technology cluster, hosting numerous research institutions and universities that drive innovation . This economic diversification has ensured that Ankara is not merely a bureaucratic enclave but a vibrant, multifaceted metropolis.
However, Ankara's role has not been without tension. The very secular, modernist identity that was imposed upon it has sometimes been a source of political and social conflict. As Turkish politics has evolved, the city has remained the central arena where battles over the soul of the nation are fought—between secularism and political Islam, between centralized authority and demands for greater pluralism. The city's planned, orderly layout contrasts with the organic chaos of Istanbul, a difference that mirrors the ongoing tension in Turkish society between the rigid, top-down modernization of the early republic and the more complex, bottom-up realities of a dynamic democracy. Despite these challenges, Ankara endures. It is a testament to a revolutionary moment when a nation, rising from the ashes of empire, made a conscious and calculated decision about its future. The city, born from both strategic necessity and profound symbolism, continues to serve as the political compass of Turkey, a constant reminder of the republic's foundational break from the past and its enduring quest to forge a modern, sovereign, and secular nation-state.
Conclusion: The Heart of a Nation
The declaration of Ankara as the capital of Turkey on 13 October 1923 was far more than a simple administrative decree; it was the culmination of a national struggle for survival and the foundational act of a revolutionary state-building project. This decision, emerging from the crucible of the Turkish War of Independence, was deeply rooted in the strategic necessities of security, the political imperatives of breaking from a discredited imperial past, and the ideological drive to create a modern, secular republic rooted in the Anatolian heartland. The transformation of Ankara from a modest provincial town into a bustling modern capital stands as one of the most tangible legacies of the Atatürk revolution, a physical manifestation of the principle of national sovereignty and the political will of the Turkish people.
The enduring significance of Ankara lies in its powerful symbolism. It represents the triumph of a pragmatic, forward-looking nationalism over the nostalgic allure of a multi-ethnic empire. It embodies the secular character of the republic, distinct from the theocratic and imperial traditions embodied by Istanbul. Even today, as Turkey navigates the complex currents of the 21st century, Ankara remains the political center of gravity, the stage upon which the nation's political dramas unfold and the repository of its republican memory. The story of Ankara is, in essence, the story of modern Turkey itself—a story of resilience, transformation, and an unwavering, though often contested, commitment to a particular vision of the nation. Its designation as the capital was not the end of a process, but the beginning of an ongoing experiment in nation-building, whose consequences continue to resonate throughout Turkey and the wider world.
Photo from: Shutterstock
0 Comment to "The Strategic Rise of Ankara: From Anatolian Town to Capital of the Turkish Republic in 1923"
Post a Comment